This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wadams3, Dbaror. Peer reviewers: Moonunit42, Jfailla1.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2020 and 23 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Afk2231, Zpopovych. Peer reviewers: SladeWillson, AsherJ22.
The cleanup tag says that "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." - but in this case, the subject is "Quantum machine learning", and there is nothing wrong with that. It is perhaps not OK to use one's own work as a source, but if it's wrong, it's wrong regardless of whether one has a close connection with the subject or not. That's why I don't like the use of the COI template in cases like these: its wording is misleading. GregorB (talk) 16:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, I'm just seeing this now. But I'm not seeing any specific issue with conflicts of interest in the article. Obviously the people that contributed to it work in the field and therefore might have papers cited in it, but there's no blatant self-adversing that I can see. If anything, you might argue that it needs updating, but that's hardly ever not going to be the case in such a rapidly evolving field. Luca (talk) 10:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can see, there are two different things being talked about in this article at the moment. There's machine learning on quantum computers (section 1), and classical machine learning for quantum mechanics problems (section 2). I'd suggest that the former stay as Quantum machine learning (since it's the more common use for the phrase), and the latter move to Quantum machine learning (physics). Thoughts? ArguMentor (talk) 11:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the split. The article talks a lot about the physics side of quantum machines so "physics" should be included in the title. Alexam22 (talk) 01:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wiki Education assignment: Quantum Information Science and Engineering
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 11 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexam22 (article contribs).