Talk:Newt (programming library) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Newt_(programming_library)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Free and open-source software. Linux Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

newt's using only gpm, without a way to use it in a terminal emulator (gpm's limitations have been commented on frequently -- see for example this) TEDickey (talk) 19:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't answered in the article. --109.192.198.207 (talk) 11:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It probably won't be (if reliable sources are used), due to the absence of documentation for newt TEDickey (talk) 12:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This blames to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Newt_%28programming_library%29&diff=prev&oldid=262134380 but I don't think it makes any sense at all. Does it run under Linux but also (NetBSD booted from a CD)? What's the CD thing mean at all? Is it parroting upstream's marketing? The edit doesn't have any refs and neither does the current text. Nabijaczleweli (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]