This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
History of display technology → Display examplesDisplay examples – The page is and has always been meant to show what display technologies that are available. The introduction year is a helpful side note, not the primary subject. Any historic description should be on a separate article as it will make it harder than otherwise to get a quick overview. Preferably a subcategory. I request that the article be renamed to its original name. Electron9 (talk) 19:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Article as it stands shows the progressive history of displays. 'Display examples' sounds like a description of a subsection of an article, not an article itself. The comments of both AfDs suggested that the name 'Display examples' was incorrect, and that it needed to be renamed. - SudoGhost (talk) 19:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - The previous AFDs show a belief that the article content provides a base from which to build a timeline or history of display technologies. The title "History of display technology" accurately reflects this whereas "Display examples" is pushing this article back into the image gallery arena. -- Whpq (talk) 13:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Merge if this is only "display examples", it should be deleted or merged into the main article. The only way this is a viable article is if it is a timeline. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:17, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
In the caption for the thin film transistor, the year is 1968. That laptop is not from 1968 and laptops were not common at that time. I do not know much about said monitor, but perhaps someone else does? Lekro (talk) 11:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 3 external links on History of display technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.