Talk:CJK Compatibility Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:CJK_Compatibility

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Typography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Writing systems Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Unicode block which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:18, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why were abbreviations such as ㌀ added? What criteria were followed? --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They date back to Unicode 1.0.0, and were added for compatibility with existing/legacy character sets which included such things. For Unicode 1.0, compatibility with existing characters sets was fundamental for getting Unicode accepted, and so many compatibility characters which were not strictly needed were encoded. BabelStone (talk) 17:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can I add [[ ]] to each character? Gioguch (talk) 20:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page and Unicode compatibility characters should be linked to each other with suitable commentary on the relation between the two. --Macrakis (talk) 13:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]