This template is within the scope of WikiProject Categories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of categories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CategoriesWikipedia:WikiProject CategoriesTemplate:WikiProject CategoriesCategories
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
I take your point about YYYY–YYYY x5 being too wide.
Moving between pages in a mixed series (years and seasons), it looks weird when the table width jumps between x5 and x3 links. How about x4 for seasons? Or perhaps x4 for YYYY–YY and x3 for YYYY–YYYY?
As for 1999–2000, IMHO the guideline should be altered to only rule out 1999–00 in article text, as it's perfectly clear when presented as part of a list of links. – FayenaticLondon13:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I made it so up to 2 YYYY–YYYY are allowed for the entire x4-per-side nav before reverting back to x3-per-side, to smooth out any navigational irregularities (e.g. COVID, 2000, etc.). ~Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)19:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I might even go 1 step further (later) & display 5 elements on each side IF the majority of the elements are only single years (e.g. surrounding Category:2019–20 FIA World Endurance Championship season), now that a lot of relevant code is in place. This will actually go a long way towards effectively (visually) merging nav_hyphen() & nav_year(), which has been in the back of my mind for a long time. Little did I know when starting this that it would be a step in that direction :) ~Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)19:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That would be nice, if it's doable – thanks, Tom.
In that series I notice that the 2018–19 and 2019–20 pages show only valid links, whereas 2017 and 2021 have a grey link for 2020 – but that's understandable, so no need to spend time on it unless there's an easy way to skip that gap. I tried using the skip-gaps parameter on the 2017 or 2021 page, but then it wrongly omits 2018–19 and 2019–20 altogether. – FayenaticLondon19:55, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added a 3rd bullet under Template:Category series navigation/doc#Condensation to explain that |skip-gaps= only works on and for year categories, and is not intended to find hyphenated ranges. Perhaps the parameter name is a bit misleading by being overly broad, but my planned improvements above will get it a step closer to earning its name - not by finding hyphenated ranges, but by at least skipping years when starting on a hyphenated range. |skip-gaps= can easily be made to work on TV seasons, ordinals (temporal, numeric, and word), and roman numerals, but I just haven't seen the need for it (i.e. those types of cats don't contain any gaps that I know of. And if they did, and the gaps were small, the gaps themselves would probably be important enough to be shown, and not skipped over.). ~Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)13:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've used the template for a number of countries in the Drag Race Franchise but Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 1 contestants and the rest of Canada's act differently. For some reason, it is showing all numbers rather than just the ones that have categories, so instead of just 1-5, it is showing -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6.Naraht (talk) 15:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I made some sandbox updates to add functionality for month year categories such as Category:February 2021, Category:July 1934 in sports, etc. It appears to be working as expected except when adding the nav_year below, it will bold the year category with the same year as the month year category, undesirably. Any ideas how to resolve this without breaking nav_year? –Aidan721 (talk) 00:55, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see you manually using Category Series Navigation at all. Looks like everything is flowing from Module:Women_in_Red_event with the category argument.
Yes, the module is calling the template. The same happens if you apply the template directly (link) so it does look like a bug in this template — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:01, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]