Help:Template/feedback Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Template/feedback

This is the feedback page for Help:Template. No action will be taken based on feedback here if it does not relate to improving the page Help:Template. Other options: If you want to provide feedback about an individual article, use the relevant talk page. You can normally also edit the article yourself; if you're new to editing, you could check out the Tutorial and do tests in the Sandbox. If you have any questions, try Wikipedia:Questions instead. If you need any help with something not covered there, you can try the Help desk.

Click here to give feedback or click here to return to Help:Template

Was this page helpful ?

Was it easy to understand ?

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

How can we make it better ?

Other comments ?

Was this page helpful ?

Was it easy to understand ?

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

How can we make it better ?

Other comments ?

Was this page helpful ?

no

Was it easy to understand ?

no

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

no

How can we make it better ?

it had too much detail need to be simplified so a person who has never made a template before can understand it.

Other comments ?

Was this page helpful ?

• yes

Was it easy to understand ?

• a bit

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

• yes

How can we make it better ?

• less technical langauge

Other comments ?

Was this page helpful ?

Was it easy to understand ?

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

How can we make it better ?

• please enter some easy way to understand how to give references to wiki article

Other comments ?

Was this page helpful ? Yes

Was it easy to understand ? No

Was it complete enough, with enough details ? Yes

How can we make it better ? I have been attempting to find and submit a speedy deletion request for the last two days and it is a little confusing because it kept taking me to different templates. Which I was unsure how to make contact.

Other comments ? I'm requesting a speedy deletion because my daughter is under attack on your site. Someone posted that she has disgraced the family by becoming a porn whore and they have attached photos and links. This is not true. It is defacing her character and interfering with her daily life. She is even considering suicide. We don't know who would do such a horrible thing and would like it removed as soon as possible please. This has affected our lives tremendously and ruining her image. Please help us remove it. It says <redacted>. I am her mother <redacted> my email is ^{[details removed]}

I have replied by email. The pages are at www.pornwikileaks.com, not at Wikipedia. -- John of Reading (talk) 13:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was this page helpful ?

Was it easy to understand ?

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

How can we make it better ?

Other comments ?

bom meu nome e ruthy e estou querendo criar uma imagen de minpq eu quero ser modelo entao eu sou upouco morena e alta cabelos ruivos bom so isso

Was this page helpful ?

• No.

Was it easy to understand ?

• Yes.

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

• No.

How can we make it better ?

• I wanted to find the equivalent of fr:Modèle:Espace. To put spaces. Because MediaWiki eats normal spaces — which is a bad thing. I have read the page but I have not found the solution yet.

Other comments ?

• Please help.

• • Reply - {{sp}} is the closest equivalent. You may also wish to take a look at {{in}} and {{space}}. Cheers, benzband (talk) 21:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was this page helpful ?

no

Was it easy to understand ?

no

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

no

How can we make it better ?

i don't know

Other comments ?

no other comments

Was this page helpful ?

No

Was it easy to understand ?

No

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

Oh Yes

How can we make it better ?

By putting it in words that kids an adults could understand.

Other comments ?

nO

Was this page helpful ?

No

Was it easy to understand ?

No

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

Oh Yes

How can we make it better ?

By putting it in words that kids an adults could understand.

Other comments ?

nO

Was this page helpful ?

No. Throwing 10,000 pages at people who are threatened to have a page/article deleted... What do you think how motivating this is? (I'm seeing 15 feedbacks here; only two state that this page was helpful. Do you get the message??)

Was it easy to understand ?

No, see above.

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

If I had five years to read everything, maybe yes. But this entire process is just frustrating.

How can we make it better ?

Look at the page of Debra Mike, understand that she's a death row prisoner (most likely innocent), and please undo the mark for deletion. Wendi Andriano (who is her cell neighbor; and there is no great doubt about her conviction) is listed on Wikipedia as well. Get better admins! This entire process is frustrating and lacks a comprehensible, easy guideline.

Other comments ?

The main problem with these feedback pages, as I see it, is that it is rarely clear which page the feedback is about. This page, for example, is intended for constructive feedback about the Help:Template page, but only one or two of the posts are unambiguously related to templates. I'd prefer to send people to the main Wikipedia:Help desk, where the questions will be seen and answered fairly quickly.

Re Debra Milke, the message on your talk page describes what is wrong with the article and describes what needs to be done to save it. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:34, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was this page helpful ?

No

Was it easy to understand ?

No; it was too huge to take full understanding, which is a charachteristic of all Wikipedia.

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

• Yes, but too long.

How can we make it better ?

• More concise and more examples

Other comments ?

Was this page helpful ?

• Yes!

Was it easy to understand ?

• Pretty easy, for a page that addresses such a complex subject

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

• Great detail!

How can we make it better ?

• The list of 'see also' links at the bottom could be annotated, with a single sentence next to each link describing what topics that help page addresses.

Other comments ?

• Great work on the feedback form!

Was this page helpful ?

• Partially

Was it easy to understand ?

• No, but got some new good things

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

• I don't think so. It appears to be too much technical in some areas related to the parser functions and the parameters. (As of 16:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC), the latter at once links to a main space article!!!) Actually even though I am used with the parameters, it made me think it was a strange thing.

How can we make it better ?

• Give examples with outputs nearby. The explanation of noinclude and the other two is not understandable. I got it cleared only from the help page on transclusions.

Areas to give extra care

• Handling parameters

Was this page helpful ?

Was it easy to understand ?

Was it complete enough, with enough details ?

How can we make it better ?

Other comments ?