Draft talk:SmartXML Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:SmartXML

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Tool (inactive) This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Tool, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ToolWikipedia:WikiProject ToolTemplate:WikiProject ToolTool

@DoubleGrazing, Hello! SmartXML only live project written in the Red programming language. Red is an extremely unique language in itself (successor of Rebol). I removed all the “marketing” from the article. I would like the wiki to have information about tools written in Red, so that I can refer to them in the article about Red. Luca-is-my-nic (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Luca-is-my-nic: okay, so you need to demonstrate that the subject is notable per WP:GNG. This draft just tells us what the thing is or does, and is written entirely from the subject's point of view; that's what makes this promotional. We want to know what entirely independent third parties have said about this. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing Who can act as such a person? The creators of the Red language have an indirect interest in this. Luca-is-my-nic (talk) 15:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We're talking secondary sources, typically published media (print or broadcast). See the WP:GNG standard for more info. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing A link to an unzooed source has been added Luca-is-my-nic (talk) 16:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing please check an article again. Now it have sources from moderated publications Luca-is-my-nic (talk) 07:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Caleb Stanford Hello! I rewrote the article to give it as neutral a background as possible. As an example I took a number of other articles about software products. I would also like to emphasize the importance of this article because the Red/Rebol language is a language with more than 30 years of history and this product is actually the only active development in the language at the moment. Luca-is-my-nic (talk) 08:22, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]