![]() | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
The latest draft was declined by Theroadislong 17 days ago.
with this comment: I am not seeing particularly significant citation counts from the sample check I have done of random references. Those cast notability into question. I'm not keen of a citation that leads to the pdf of a thesis rather than the journal it was published in. My view is that needs better referencing. Please do not confuse this with more referencing. We always prefer quality to quantity đ”đžâđșđŠ FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me đșđŠâđ”đž 15:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
I accept the criticism of my using a citation that leads to the pdf of a thesis. I removed that citation.
Instead, I added 4 new citations that have appreciable number of citations (I used scholar.google for the citation counts). Now, the list of citations includes a total of 9 papers with citation counts ranging from 14 to 110. These are fairly respectable numbers for AI and CS technical papers. I show the list of papers along with the counts, below.
Let me add that one of the citations is a paper by Fikes and Garvey, âKnowledge Representation and Reasoning â A History of DARPA Leadership,â which was an invited review of DARPA programs in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in highly respected AI Magzaine. This review of DARPAâs history of AI-oriented programs stated the following about the topic of the proposed article: âReal-Time Adversarial Intelligence and Decision-making, started in 2004, was the first program to explicitly model and reason about an adversaryâs objectives, intent, and plans.â I.e., they highlighted this program a key AI program in DARPAâs history, and the first one with adversarial reasoning.
Papers with citation counts:
Schubert et al, âArtificial Intelligence for Decision Support in Command and Control Systemsâ â 65 citations.
Kott et al, "Hypothesis-driven information fusion in adversarial, deceptive environments" â 29 citations
Serge et al, âMake it usable: Highlighting the importance of improving the intuitiveness and usability of a computer-based training simulation" â 14 citations
Singer, âTactical Generals: Leaders, Technology, and the Perils of Battlefield Micromanagementâ â 56 citations
Johnson âDelegating strategic decision-making to machines: Dr. Strangelove Redux?â â 83 citations
Van Dyke Parunak et al, âA model of emotions for situated agentsâ -- 110 citations
McEneaney and Singh, âRobustness against deceptionâ -- 17 citations
Stilman et al, âThe primary language of ancient battlesâ -- 26 citations
Zhang et al, âApplication of artificial intelligence in military: from projects viewâ -- 30 citations Cz13sz17 (talk) 01:17, 26 June 2025 (UTC)