This may take a week or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 371 pending submissions waiting for review.
If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.
Comment: Wikipedia articles require recent reliable independent secondary sources with in depth coverage of the subjects.If decent sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page once you've resubmitted the article for review. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Thrust coefficient or (sometimes ) is a dimensionless number that measures the performance of a nozzle, most commonly in a rocket engine, independent of combustion performance. It is often used to compare the performance of different nozzle geometries. After combining it with characteristic velocity, then an effective exhaust velocity and a specific impulse can be found to characterize the overall efficiency of a rocket engine design.[1]
The thrust coefficient characterizes the supersonic flow in the expansion section downstream of the nozzle throat, in contrast to characteristic velocity which characterizes the subsonic flow in the combustion chamber and contraction section upstream of the throat.[2]
Thrust coefficients characterize how well a nozzle will boost the efficiency of a rocket engine by expanding the exhaust gas and dropping its pressure before it meets ambient conditions. A of 1 corresponds to zero ambient pressure and no expansion at all; i.e. the throat exhausts straight to vacuum without any diverging nozzle at all. The effective exhaust velocity would then be equal to the characteristic velocity provided by the combustion chamber. Typical thrust coefficients seen in aerospace industry rocket engines vary between about 1.3 and 2.[3] Virtually all large engines since the 1960's have used a bell nozzle geometry which optimizes for the highest thrust coefficient; this was first derived by Gadicharla V.R. Rao. using the method of characteristics.[4]
An ideal nozzle has parallel, uniform exit flow; this is achieved when the pressure at the exit plane equals the ambient pressure. In vacuum conditions this means an ideal nozzle is infinitely long. The area ratio can be derived from isentropic flow, also given here[2]:
There are no simple relations for divergence inefficiency for a more general nozzle contour, such as a bell nozzle. Instead the thrust coefficient must be integrated directly, assuming pressure variation across the nozzle exit plane has already been found:
is the inner radius of the nozzle at the exit plane (m). In an annular nozzle it is the distance between the outer wall and the plug at the exit plane.
is the distance from the central axis to the point of interest (m). The relationship assumes radial symmetry of all properties.
is the pressure of the exhaust gas at the exit plane at a given (Pa).
is the density of the exhaust gas at the exit plane at a given (kg/m3).
is the speed of the exhaust gas at the exit plane at a given (m/s).
is the angular direction of the exhaust gas velocity at the exit plane at a given (rad).
^Heister, Stephen D.; Anderson, William E.; Pourpoint, Timothée; Cassady, Joseph (2018). Rocket propulsion (First ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-1-108-42227-7.
^Huzel, Dieter K.; Huang, David H. (2000). Modern Engineering for Design of Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. ISBN978-1-56347-013-4.
^ abcSutton, George Paul; Biblarz, Oscar (2017). Rocket propulsion elements (Ninth ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc. ISBN978-1-118-75388-0.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.