Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Philosophy

WikiProject Philosophy / Philosophers (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Project This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Additional information:
Taskforce icon

Did you know nomination[edit]

Rfc on Falsifiability[edit]

Your comments will be appreciated at Talk:Falsifiability#RfC:_Adding_a_challenging,_counterintuitive_but_instructive_and_well_sourced_example_in_the_lead.

AFD on Definitions of knowledge[edit]

So far only three editors are involved so it might be good to get some more responses to the arguments presented for and against, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definitions of knowledge. Phlsph7 (talk) 06:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for comments at Talk:Astrology[edit]

There is a RfC about how to word the first sentences of the lead at Talk:Astrology#Request for comments: Lead paragraph which may be of interest to the members of this WikiProject. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 18:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FAR for Hilary Putnam[edit]

I have nominated Hilary Putnam for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quine–Putnam indispensability argument peer review[edit]

I've recently listed the article Quine–Putnam indispensability argument for peer review here. Any comments would be very much appreciated. Thanks. Alduin2000 (talk) 00:22, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alan Chalmers is the father of David Chalmers?[edit]

An editor recently added this information to the Alan Chalmers article. Is it true? I did a quick Google and could not easily find anything. Thriley (talk) 23:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Thriley: don't think so. According to the Scientific American, David Chalmers has said "My father is a medical researcher, a pretty successful scientist and administrator in medicine in Australia" which doesn't seem to fit David Chalmers. I've seen some other sites say his father is John Philip Chalmers which would fit that description more but I also can't find a reliable source for that either. Alduin2000 (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]