Talk:Live Science Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Live_Science

WikiProject Magazines (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.


Is it \'liv\ or \'līv\ Science? (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Factual or Pseudo-Science?[edit]

What is the reliability and credibility of this site? Factual or Pseudo-Science? (talk) 02:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I checked a few articles; all appeared to be based on peer-reviewed publications in reputable journals. Scanning the headlines in article lists did not raise pseudo-science red flags with me.  --Lambiam 13:00, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Today's front page includes these articles:
"8 ways life would get weird on a flat Earth"
"4 bizarre Stephen Hawking theories that turned out to be right (and 6 we're not sure about)"
"China is gearing up to activate the world's first 'clean' commercial nuclear reactor"
The first two are obvious clickbait (and not science at all). The third one is full of factual errors. I would say that the quality of this website is pretty bad if you're looking for science news.

--Echawkes (talk) 18:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Live science (talk) 13:11, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]