mic_none

Sabarna Roy Choudhury Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabarna_Roy_Choudhury

Sabarna Roy Choudhury was a Zamindar family of Mughal Bengal. They controlled vast swathes of territory, including what would later become Kolkata, prior to the sale of zamindari rights in 1698 to the East India Company.

Zamindari[edit]

Establishment Legends[edit]

Family tradition holds that one ascetic of Benaras—Kamdev Brahmachari, born Jia Ganguly and the only heir of Panchu Ganguly "Khan"—had Man Singh I among his disciples.[1][2] Kamdev had not only taught him all the tricks of war but also provided tactical knowledge about quelling Pratapaditya of Bengal, a rebel vassal.[1][2]

In the meanwhile, Jia's son, Lakshmikanta Ganguly, who was deserted at his birth, had become the Chief Revenue Officer of Pratapaditya.[1] Mansingh had him switch sides before subduing the rebellion c. 1613.[1] In return, the zamindari rights of multiple parganas including but not limited to the three villages of Sutanuti, Govindapur and Dihi Kalikata were granted to him, who went on to adopt the surname of Roy Choudhury.[1][3][note 1] The Gangulys are held to be the traditional patrons (and worshipers) of the Kalighat Kali and thus, the particular choice of lands.[1] These territories were still owned by the Mughal emperor but the right to governance and tax-collection, a major part of which was to be remitted to the Mughal Court, was ceded away with.[1][note 2]

Historical accuracy[edit]

Man Singh I had never waged any war against Pratapaditya and the background story about the receipt of grant appears to be fictional.[4] The factual authenticity of Roy Chowdhurys' being the traditional patrons of the deity is disputed.[5][note 3] Notwithstanding the unclear circumstances governing their rise to the elite strata, they were one of the first Brahmin families of would-be Calcutta.[2] However, by then, Sutanuti was already a major wool-trading center where had flourished the Bysacks, Seths, and a group of Portuguese merchants.[6][7] In Calcutta itself, Armenian traders had set foot and commanded significant influence.[8]

Relinquishment[edit]

Around early March 1698, the East India Company (EIC) proposed that the Choudhury have them sub-rent Dihi Kalikata.[9][7][note 4] The offer was rejected since Choudhury saw a chance of permanently losing the properties to a far-powerful client.[9][7] This led the EIC to negotiate for the rent-rights at the Mughal quarters outright and one Nathaniel Walsh was dispatched to Prince Azim-ush-Shan, then-Viceroy of Bengal Subah.[9][10][7]

The negotiations proved successful.[9] On 14 April, Walsh informed the Court about the Prince confirming an informal grant of Zamindari rights.[7][10][note 5][note 6] Only around early July, the nishaan would be signed by the Diwan and sent to the Prince: the reason for delay being the multiple complains lodged by Choudhury who was ultimately granted a compensation of 1000 Rupees by Azim-ush-Shan, of which half had to be borne by the Company.[10][note 7][note 8] Around early July, the Choudhury made another last-ditch effort at stalling the transfer by promising a sum of 6000 Rupees to the Prince but failed.[note 9][10] On 14 July two copies of Nishaan were received[note 9] but on 22 July, it was asked of Welsh to get them stamped by the Qadi[note 10]; on 1 August, three appropriately-stamped copies of nishaans were finally received.[note 11][10] The zamindari rights, not only for Dihi Kalikata but also for Sutanuti and Govindapur, had been transferred to the Company but subsequent to them paying the Choudhury another 1000 Rupees.[9][11][note 12]

The company started execution of the transfer in around October.[9] Despite the nishaans and presence of Mughal officials, the Choudhury proved unwilling to part with the lands and even threatened to complaint Aurangzeb about Azim-ush-Shan's ways.[9][7] So, the Company proposed to pay them an additional 500 Rupees, if they consented in writing about relinquishing all claims to the lands permanently.[note 13][9][7] On 9 November 1698, the bainama (sale/transfer-deed) was finally executed in tune with what the Company sought; the Choudhury had sold all of their rights to Charles Eyre for a renegotiated sum of 1300 Rupees.[6][3][9][7][11]

On 3 February 1699, Diwan Izzat Khan issued a parwana declaring the sale deed to be operative; thenceforth, the Mughals were to recognize the Company as the permanent taluqdars.[7][note 14] The Choudhury moved to Barisha soon after the sale.[2] This pioneer purchase of zamindari will remain a keystone for the British ascendency in South Asia; the three villages will gradually merge with each other (and other adjacent territories) under the Company administration, to form the modern town of Calcutta.[7][12][13][note 15]

Analysis[edit]

The sale proved to be a deviation; prior, the Mughals had seldom bothered with negotiating the sale of zamindaris and usually gave the involved tax-farmers a free hand.[7] This is popularly attributed to the Company's showering of a variety of gifts on Azim-ush-Shan as well as his relatives and officials.[9][7][10] However, the gifts or token sums are not perceptible as bribes — being mostly in the form of nazrana or peshkash — and they were anyway too meager for the concessions decreed.[7]

Durga Puja[edit]

The Sabarna Roy Choudhurys were one of the earliest to hold the public festival of Durga Puja — apparently, in 1610.[14]

Museum[edit]

Sabarna Sangrahashala, a heritage museum in Kolkata is run by the family.[15][16]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Apparently, they were originally based in Halisahar but migrated to Gopalpore and Birati across the next two generations in tune with the increasing extents of reclaimed land.
  2. ^ It is disputed if the Zamindars exerted any ownership over their land. Farhat Hasan argues in favor.
  3. ^ However, the current temple was indeed constructed by them in 1809 -- a structure of unknown origin had existed before that, at-least for about a century.
  4. ^ Consult corresponding entries in the diary maintained at the Chuttanutte [Sutanuti] Factory.
  5. ^ Consult corresponding entries in the diary maintained at the Chuttanutte [Sutanuti] Factory.
  6. ^ As early as 1 April, the Company Court at Sutanuti had received a letter from Walsh noting the amenability of the Prince to the proposal, if paid a sum of 2000 Rupees in addition to the usual Zamindari fees.[10]
  7. ^ Consult corresponding entries in the diary maintained at the Chuttanutte [Sutanuti] Factory.
  8. ^ The Court had to prod Walsh (and the Prince) several times - 20 May, 18 June - for quick issuance of nishaan, as they faced increasing difficulties in managing their settlements at Kalikata.
  9. ^ a b Consult corresponding entries in the diary maintained at the Chuttanutte [Sutanuti] Factory.
  10. ^ Consult corresponding entries in the diary maintained at the Chuttanutte [Sutanuti] Factory.
  11. ^ Consult corresponding entries in the diary maintained at the Chuttanutte [Sutanuti] Factory.
  12. ^ The original copy of Azim-ush-Shan's nishaan has been lost since before 1917 and gauging the exact legal rights it conferred on the EIC remains difficult. From other records, it is clear that they had the right to collect taxes from subjects, deal with waste-lands to their wishes, and impose minor taxes and fines. However, they were forbidden from raising the land-taxes without consulting the Mughal administration.[11][9] Some authors incorrectly deem the transaction to be a lease of the lands.
  13. ^ Consult corresponding entries in the diary maintained at the Chuttanutte [Sutanuti] Factory.
  14. ^ This terminology can be confusing, if read against B. R. Grover's documentation of revenue structure in Bengal Subah: taluqdars and above them, the zamindars, who paid the Mughal exchequer with "group tax". The differences between the two classes seem to have been minimal by Aurangzeb's time; the EIC had no local overlord and they directly paid the taxes to Mughals.
  15. ^ Consult Bhattacharyya, Debjani (2018). Empire and Ecology in the Bengal Delta: The Making of Calcutta. Studies in Environment and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-42574-2. for an environmental perspective on the history of Calcutta but outside the tropes of urban history.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Ray, Atul Kṛṣṇa (1902). Census of India 1901. Vol. 7: 1. pp. 9–10.
  2. ^ a b c d Roy, Samaren (1991). Calcutta : Society and Change, 1690-1990. Calcutta: Rupa. pp. 8–9. ISBN 978-81-7167-054-3.
  3. ^ a b Nair, P. Thankappan, The Growth and Development of Old Calcutta, in Calcutta, the Living City, Vol I, p. 11, edited by Sukanta Chaudhuri, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-563696-1
  4. ^ Ray, Aniruddha. "Bengal". Towns and Cities of Medieval India: A Brief Survey. Routledge. p. 222.
  5. ^ Moodie, Deonnie (6 November 2018). The Making of a Modern Temple and a Hindu City: Kalighat and Kolkata. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-088528-1.
  6. ^ a b Banka, Neha (25 August 2021). "Explained: 'Calcutta does not have a birthday', but it has some markers of urbanisation". The Indian Express.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Hasan, Farhat (1992). "Indigenous Cooperation and the Birth of a Colonial City: Calcutta, c. 1698-1750". Modern Asian Studies. 26 (1): 66–70. ISSN 0026-749X.
  8. ^ Birth of a Colonial City: Calcutta. Ranjit Sen
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Firminger, Walter Kelly (1917). "The Company becomes Zamindar". The fifth report from the select committee of the house of commons on the affairs of the east India company. Vol. 1. Calcutta: R. Cambray & Co. pp. lxvi–lxviii.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Wilson, C. R. (1906). Old Fort William In Bengal. Vol. 1. pp. 34–42.
  11. ^ a b c Bhattacharyya, Debjani (2014). "Geography's myth: The many origins of Calcutta". In Pandey, Gyanendra (ed.). Unarchived Histories: The ‘mad’ and the ‘trifling’ in the colonial and postcolonial world. Abingdon: Routledge. pp. 148, 157. ISBN 9780415717755.
  12. ^ Banerjee, Sumanta (2003). "'City of Dreadful Night': Crime and Punishment in Colonial Calcutta". Economic and Political Weekly. 38 (21): 2045. ISSN 0012-9976.
  13. ^ HYRAPIET, SHIREEN; GREINER, ALYSON L. (2012). "CALCUTTA'S HAND-PULLED RICKSHAWS: CULTURAL POLITICS AND PLACE MAKING IN A GLOBALIZING CITY". Geographical Review. 102 (4): 409. ISSN 0016-7428.
  14. ^ Bhattacharya, Tithi (2007). "Tracking the Goddess: Religion, Community, and Identity in the Durga Puja Ceremonies of Nineteenth-Century Calcutta". The Journal of Asian Studies. 66 (4): 933–934. ISSN 0021-9118.
  15. ^ "Sabarna Sangrahashala". Museums of India. sahapedia.org. Retrieved 25 August 2021.
  16. ^ "ইতিহাস ও ঐতিহ্যের ধারক সাবর্ণ সংগ্রহশালা | বাংলাদেশ প্রতিদিন". Bangladesh Pratidin. 14 February 2015. Retrieved 25 August 2021.