mic_none

Gender and religion Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_and_religion

Sex differences in religion can be classified as either "internal" or "external". Internal religious issues are studied from the perspective of a given religion, and might include religious beliefs and practices about the roles and rights of men and women in government, education and worship; beliefs about the sex or gender of deities and religious figures; and beliefs about the origin and meaning of human gender. External religious issues can be broadly defined as an examination of a given religion from an outsider's perspective, including possible clashes between religious leaders and laity;[1] and the influence of, and differences between, religious perspectives on social issues.

Gender of deities[edit]

The earliest documented religions, and some contemporary animist religions, involve the deification of characteristics of the natural world. These spirits are typically, but not always, gendered. It has been proposed, since the 19th century, that polytheism arose out of animism, as religious epic provided personalities to autochthonous animist spirits in various parts of the world, notably in the development of ancient near eastern and Indo-European literature. Polytheistic gods are also typically gendered. The earliest evidence of monotheism is the worship of the goddess Eurynome, Aten in Egypt, the teaching of Moses in the Torah and Zoroastrianism in Persia. Aten, Yahweh and Ahura Mazda are all masculine deities, embodied only in metaphor, so masculine rather than reproductively male.[citation needed]

Hinduism

The Hindu goddess, Kali, breaks the gender role of women representing love, sex, fertility, and beauty because she is the goddess of both the life cycle and destructive war. An example of the typical female goddess is Aphrodite, who is shown as vain, simple, and beautiful.[citation needed]

Christianity

In Christianity, one entity of the Trinity, the Son, is believed to have become incarnate as a human male. Christians have traditionally believed that God the Father has masculine gender rather than male sex because the Father has never been incarnated. By contrast, there is less historical consensus on the gender of the Holy Spirit.

Islam

In Islam, God is not gendered literally or metaphorically.[2] God is referred to with the masculine pronoun in Arabic [Huwa or 'He'], as there is no neuter in the Arabic language. Ascribing natural gender to God is considered heretical because God is described as incomparable to creation. The Quran says: There is nothing like Him, and He ˹alone˺ is the All-Hearing, All-Seeing.[3]

In contrast to Christian theology, Jesus is viewed as a prophet rather than a human male incarnation of God,[4] and the primary sources of Islam [the Quran and Sunnah] do not refer to God as the 'Father'.

Creation myths about human gender[edit]

In many stories, man and woman are created at the same time, with equal standing. One example is the creation story in Genesis 1: "And God created the man in his image. In the image of God he created him. Male and female he created them."[5] Some commentators interpret the parallelism to be deliberately stressing that mankind is, in some sense, a "unity in diversity" from a divine perspective (compare e pluribus unum),[6] and that women as well as men are included in God's image. The first man, Adam, has been viewed as a spiritual being or an ideal who can be distinguished as both male and female; an androgynous being with no sex.[7] Pierre Chaunu argues that Genesis' gender-inclusive conception of humanity contrasts sharply with the views of gender found in older literature from surrounding cultures, and suggests a higher status of women in western society due to Judæo-Christian influence, and based on this verse.[8] Some scholars, such as Philo, argue that the "sexes" were developed through an accidental division of the "true self" which existed prior to being assigned with gender.[9]

In other accounts, man is created first, followed by woman. This is the case in the creation account of Genesis 2, where the first woman (Eve) is created from the rib of the first man (Adam), as a companion and helper.[10] There is an interesting correlation between the two gender creation stories, both stories imagine the ideal of the unitary self. However, the unitary self is either androgynous or physically male; both of which are masculine in configuration. Thus male and female are to become one; meaning that she is to become male.[11][clarification needed]

In Plato's Symposium, Aristophanes provides an account to explain gender and romantic attraction.[12] There were originally three sexes: the all-male, the all-female, and the "androgynous", who was half man, half woman. As punishment for attacking the gods, each was split in half. The halves of the androgynous being became heterosexual men and women, while the halves of the all-male and all-female became gays and lesbians, respectively.[13]

Leadership roles[edit]

Some religions restrict leadership to males.[14] The ordination of women has been a controversial issue in some religions where either the rite of ordination, or the role that an ordained person fulfills, has traditionally been restricted to men because of cultural or theological prohibitions.[15][16][17]

Beginning in the 19th century, some Christian denominations have ordained women.[18] Among those who do not, many believe it is forbidden by 1 Timothy 2. Some of those denominations ordain women to the diaconate, believing this is encouraged by 1 Timothy 3–4.[citation needed]

Some Islamic communities (mainly outside the Middle East) have recently appointed women as imams, normally with ministries restricted to leading women in prayer and other charitable ministries.[citation needed]

Dharmic religions[edit]

Both masculine and feminine deities feature prominently in Hinduism. The identity of the Vedic writers is not known, but the first hymn of the Rigveda is addressed to the masculine deity Agni, and the pantheon of the Vedas is dominated by masculine gods. The most prominent Avatars of Vishnu are men.[citation needed]

Mostly, the traditional religious leaders of Jainism are men. The 19th tirthankara (traditional leader) Māllīnātha in this half cycle was female.[citation needed]

Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha) was a man, but the female Buddha Vajrayogini is very important in Buddhism.[citation needed]

Abrahamic religions[edit]

In Abrahamic religions, Abraham himself, Moses, David and Elijah are among the most significant leaders documented according to the traditions of the Hebrew Bible. John the Baptist, Jesus and his apostles, and Saul of Tarsus again give the New Testament an impression of the founders and key figures of Christianity being male dominated. They were followed by a millennium of theologians known as the Church Fathers. Islam was founded by Muhammad, and his successor Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman ibn Affan and Ali, for Sunnis and Ali ibn Abi Talib and The Twelve Imams for those of Shia faith, were also men. On the other hand, The Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus of Nazareth, is not associated with leadership or teaching, but is nonetheless a key figure in Catholicism. Fatimah, daughter of Muhammad is regarded by Muslims as an exemplar for men and women.[citation needed]

The Baháʼí Faith, a fast growing religion, teaches that men and women are equal. Prominent women celebrated in Baháʼí history include Bahíyyih Khánum, who acted head of the faith for several periods during the ministries of `Abdu'l-Bahá and Shoghi Effendi, and Táhirih, who is also held by Baháʼís as a penultimate leader. Women serve in higher percentages of leadership in appointed and elected national and international institutions of the religion than in the general population. However, only men are allowed to be members of the religion's highest governing body, the Universal House of Justice.[citation needed]

Nakayama Miki was the founder of Tenrikyo, which may be the largest religion to have a woman founder. Ellen G. White was instrumental to the founding of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and is officially considered a prophet by Seventh-day Adventists.[19][better source needed] In particular, White's biblical commentaries and other writings are often considered inspired or even infallible.[citation needed]

Mary Baker Eddy was the founder of the Christian Science movement.[20][better source needed]

Segregation[edit]

Many religions have traditionally practiced sex segregation.

In traditional Jewish synagogues, the women's section is separated from the men's section by a wall or curtain called a mechitza.[21] Men are not permitted to pray in the presence of women, to prevent distraction.[21] The mechitza shown in the picture on the right is one in a synagogue affiliated with the 'left wing' (more modern side) of Modern Orthodox Judaism, which requires the mechitza to be of the height shown in the picture. More traditional or 'right wing' Modern Orthodox Judaism, and all forms of Haredi Judaism, requires the mechitza to be of a type which absolutely prevents the men from seeing the women.

Enclosed religious orders are usually segregated by gender.

Sex segregation in Islam includes guidelines on interaction between men and women. Men and women also worship in different areas in most mosques. Both men and women cover their awra when in the presence of members of the opposite sex (who are not close relations).

Roles in marriage[edit]

Nearly all religions recognize marriage, and many religions also promote views on appropriate gender roles within marriage.

Christianity[edit]

Within Christianity, two notable views on gender roles in marriage are complementarianism and egalitarianism. The complementarian view of marriage is widely accepted in Christianity, the husband is viewed as the leader and wife viewed as the follower.[22] Essentially, the man is given more of a headship role and the woman is viewed as a supporting partner. In Genesis 3, Adam named his wife Eve ("life") because she "was the mother of all living" (Genesis 3:20).

In mainstream Christian tradition, the relationship between a husband and wife is believed to mirror the relationship between Christ and the Church. This can be seen in Ephesians 5:25:[23]

Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.

The man, Christian traditionalists assert, is meant to be a living martyr for his wife, "giving himself up for her" daily and through acts of unselfish love.[24] The woman, on the other hand, is meant to be a helper.[24][better source needed]

While complementarianism has been the norm for years, some Christians have moved toward egalitarian views.[25] As the nature of gender roles within societies changes, religious views on gender roles in marriage change as well.[25]

Islam[edit]

In Islam, a woman's primary responsibility is usually interpreted as fulfilling her role as a wife and mother, whereas women still have the right and are free to work.[26] A man's role is to work and be able to protect and financially support his wife and family.[27]

In regards to guidelines in marriage, a man is allowed to marry a Muslim, Jewish, Sabaean, or Christian woman whereas a woman is only allowed to marry a Muslim man. Both genders cannot marry nonbelievers or polytheists.[28]

The matter of divorce is discussed in verse 2:228 of the Qu'ran. The Qu'ran instructs women to wait at least three menstrual periods, called Iddah, before committing to a second marriage. The purpose of the Iddah is to ensure that a woman's pregnancy will be linked to the correct biological father. In the case of a Talāq, which is a divorce initiated by the man, the man is supposed to announce the words "I divorce you" aloud three times, each separated by a three-month waiting period. Certain practices of the Talāq divorce allows the "I divorce you" utterance to be completed in one sitting; however, the concept of "Triple Divorce" in one sitting is considered wrong in some branches of Islam such as with the Shia Muslims. During the three-month waiting period, only the man has the right to initiate a marital reunion if both sides desire to reconcile. This yields a gender equality perspective in the sense that women have power over men in regards to finance parallel to how men have power over women in regards to obedience, both of which are only valid to a reasonable extent. While a Ṭalāq can be completed easily, a divorce that is initiated by the woman, called a Khula, is harder to obtain due to a woman's requirement to repay her dowry and give up child custody. More specifically, a woman is to give up custody of her child if the child is over the age of seven. If a woman gains custody of her child who is under the age of seven, she must still forfeit custody upon the child's seventh birthday. Although the Islamic religion requires the woman to repay her dowry, she is also entitled to receive financial support from her former husband if needed. This cycle of financial matters protects the woman's property from being taken advantage of during or after marriage.[29]

Cultural effects on religious practice[edit]

Religious worship may vary by individual due to differing cultural experiences of gender.

Greco-Roman Paganism[edit]

Both men and women who practiced paganism in ancient civilizations such as Rome and Greece worshiped male and female deities, but goddesses played a much larger role in women's lives. Roman and Greek goddesses' domains often aligned with culturally specific gender expectations at the time which served to perpetrate them in many cases. One such expectation of women was to marry at a relatively young age. The quadrennial Bear Festival, known as Arkteia, was held on the outskirts of Athens in honor of Artemis and involved girls ages seven to fourteen. The girls would compete in public athletic events as Greek men sat as onlookers, observing potential wives.[30]

Demeter, the goddess of fertility, was a prominent deity due to women's ability to relate to her. The myth surrounding Demeter involves her losing her daughter, Persephone, against her will to Hades and the grief she experiences after the event.[30] Mother-daughter relationships were very important to ancient Greeks and the severance of that relationship by fathers and husbands created much strain in young women who were forced to leave their mothers and submit to their husbands and the patriarchal society.[31] Demeter was honored through female-exclusive ceremonies in various rituals due to her general disdain for the behaviors of men. Aphrodite, too, was honored by similar means.[30] To women during this time period, the thought of Aphrodite's attitude toward males was comforting as she refused to answer to any mortal man, exhibiting the control that mortal women desired to have in their own lives.[32]

Religious teachings on gender-related issues[edit]

Abortion[edit]

In many religions, abortion is considered immoral.

The Catholic Church recognizes conception as the beginning of a human life, thus abortion is prohibited under all circumstances. However, according to the Second Vatican Council, women who have had an abortion but are willing to commit to the right of life are ensured forgiveness.[33]

In Hinduism, it is a woman's human duty to produce offspring, thus having an abortion is a violation of that duty. The Vedas, which are age-old sacred Sanskrit texts, suggests that abortion is more sinful than killing a priest or one's own parents.[34] The practice of a woman having an abortion is deemed as unacceptable in the Hindu community, both socially and morally.[35]

Homosexuality[edit]

Homosexuality is expressly forbidden in many religions, but typically in casuistic rather than apodictic laws. As such, the rationale for such proscriptions is not clearly evident, though avoidance of procreation and contribution to society via establishing families are sometimes offered as pragmatic considerations.

In general, homosexuality is perceived as sinful in conservative movements and fully accepted in liberal movements. For example, the Southern Baptist Christian denomination considers homosexuality a sin whereas the American Baptist denomination perceives homosexuality on an inclusive scale.[36]

Transgender identities[edit]

Paganism and Neo-paganism[edit]

Many Pagan religions place an emphasis on female divine energy which is manifested as The Goddess. The consensus is unclear on what is considered female and male. During PantheaCon in 2011, a group of Dianic Wiccans performing an all-female ritual turned away trans-women from joining due to their concept of women as capable of experiencing menstruation and childbirth.[37]

Other pagans, however, have embraced a multitude of gender identities by worshiping transgender, intersex, and queer gods from antiquity, such as Greek god, Hermaphroditus.[38]

Religious support for gender equality[edit]

Some religions, religious scholars and religious have argued that "gender inequality" exists either generally or in certain instances, and have supported a variety of remedies.

Sikhs believe in equality of men and women. Gender equality in Sikhism is exemplified by the following quote from Sikh holy scriptures: “From woman, man is born; within woman, man is conceived; to a woman he is engaged and married. Woman becomes his friend; through woman, the future generations come. When his woman dies, he seeks another woman; to woman he is bound. So why call her bad from whom kings are born. From woman, woman is born; without woman, there would be no one at all." – Translated into English from Gurmukhi, Siri Guru Nanak Sahib in Raag Aasaa, Siri Guru Granth Sahib pp 473

Pierre Chaunu has argued that the influence of Christianity promotes equality for women.[8]

Priyamvada Gopal, of Churchill College, Cambridge, argues that increased gender equality is indeed a product of Judeo-Christian doctrine, but not exclusive to it. She expresses concern that gender equality is used by western countries as a rationale for "neocolonialism".[39] Jamaine Abidogun argues that Judeo-Christian influence has indeed shaped gender roles in Nigeria (a strongly Christianised country); however, she doesn't consider feminism to be a product of Judeo-Christian doctrine, but rather a preferable form of "neocolonialism".[40][clarification needed]

Gender patterns in religious observance[edit]

In studies pertaining to gender patterns in religions, it has been widely accepted that females are more likely to be religious than males. In 1997, statistics gathered by Beit-Hallahmi and Argyle theorized this phenomenon into three primary causes. The first explanation is that women feel emotions at greater heights than men do, thus women tend to turn to religion more in times of high emotions such as gratitude or guilt. The second explanation is that female socialization is more likely to align with values that are commonly found in religion such as conflict mediation, tenderness, and humility. In contrast, male socialization is more likely to emphasize rebellion, thus making the guideline aspects of religion less appealing. The third explanation, which is also the most recent theory, is that females are more likely to be able to identify with religion as a natural consequence of societal structures. For example, since a majority of religions emphasize women as caretakers of the home, the societal expectation of women to take greater responsibility than men for the upbringing of a child makes religion an appealing commitment. Another example is that traditionally, men tend to work outside the home whereas women tend to work inside the home, which corresponds to studies that have shown that people are more likely to be religious when working inside of their homes.[41]

The Pew Research Center studied the effects of gender on religiosity throughout the world, finding that women are generally more religious than men, yet the gender gap is greater for Christians than Muslims.[42]

Specific religions[edit]

More information on the role of gender in specific religions can be found on the following pages:

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Juschka, Darlene. "Gender." In ed. J. Hinnels. The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2010:245-258.
  2. ^ "Islam, Irigaray, and the retrieval of Gender". www.masud.co.uk. Retrieved 2020-11-08.
  3. ^ "Surah Ash-Shuraa - 42:11". quran.com. Retrieved 2020-11-08.
  4. ^ Hasan, Mehdi (24 December 2009). "Jesus in Islam". The Guardian.
  5. ^ Genesis 1:27
  6. ^ See Geneva College discussion of a biblical foundation for a broader concept of multiculturalism based on this verse" "Rather, human diversification receives its first mention in Genesis 1:27, where the text announces the creation of the one human race: 'So God created the human race in his own image ... male and female he made them.' The text's singular term, 'human race' (`Adam in Hebrew), is specified as diverse in gender, male and female. Diversification immediately receives further stimulus in the Cultural Mandate of Genesis 1:28: "Be fruitful, increase in number, fill the earth and subdue it." This divine command calls explicitly for the scattering of the race—a theme that shall recur in the Genesis narratives—and thus calls implicitly for cultural diversification." Byron Curtis, "A Blueprint for Excellence Through Diversity at Geneva College", (Geneva College, 1999).
  7. ^ Boyarin, Daniel. "Gender." In ed. M.C. Taylor. Critical Terms for Religious Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998: 120.
  8. ^ a b "Pierre Chaunu also contends that the very recognition of women as full-fledged human beings depends on moral and ethical categories that derive ultimately from the Bible. He points out, for example, in his book Foi et histoire (Faith and History, 1980), that it is only in those cultures where the biblical text and Christianity have had some long term influence, that the status of women has gradually improved from that of property and progenitor to that of a full human being, equal to man. In cultures where the biblical text has not had any significant impact, women are regarded as property whose main purpose is to produce children. In such cultures, women are married as soon as they are able to procreate, they have little or no access to formal education, and they are allowed little self-determination. The main reason behind this social transformation is fundamentally linked to a statement found in Genesis 1:27: 'God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.' This text affirms the intrinsic dignity of both men and women regardless of their gender or social status. This is in stark contrast to ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia where the value of human beings was primarily determined on the basis of their social standing." Pierre Gilbert, How the Bible Shapes Our World
  9. ^ Boyarin, 120.
  10. ^ Genesis 2:18
  11. ^ Boyarin, 124.
  12. ^ Richard L. Hunter, Plato's Symposium, (Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 60.
  13. ^ The Symposium of Plato, 189c2-193d5
  14. ^ "Women strive for larger roles in male-dominated religions". AP NEWS. January 14, 2019.
  15. ^ Blau, Eleanor (August 23, 1974). "Women Priests: Episcopal Ordination Controversy" – via NYTimes.com.
  16. ^ "Women as Roman Catholic priests? Opinions are divided -- and fiery". Los Angeles Times. September 23, 2015.
  17. ^ "The Early Controversies Over Female Leadership". Christian History | Learn the History of Christianity & the Church.
  18. ^ "When churches started to ordain women". www.religioustolerance.org.
  19. ^ "Fundamental Beliefs". Seventh-day Adventist Church. Archived from the original on 2006-03-10. Retrieved 2006-11-01.
  20. ^ "Mary Baker Eddy". Christian Science.
  21. ^ a b "Synagogues, Shuls and Temples". jewfaq.org. Retrieved 2007-02-25.
  22. ^ DeRogatis, Amy (March 2005). "What Would Jesus Do? Sexuality and Salvation in Protestant Evangelical Sex Manuals, 1950s to the Present". Church History. 74 (1): 97–137. doi:10.1017/S0009640700109679. S2CID 162650465.
  23. ^ "Ephesians 5:25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her". biblehub.com.
  24. ^ a b Grudem, Wayne, ed. (2002). Biblical Foundations for Manhood and Womanhood (PDF). US: Crossway Books. ISBN 1-58134-409-0.
  25. ^ a b Thomas, Gary (2013). The Sacred Search: What If It's Not about Who You Marry, But Why?. David C Cook. ISBN 978-1-4347-0554-9.[page needed]
  26. ^ Ahmed, L., 1992, Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate, New Haven, Yale University Press.
  27. ^ Hessini, L., 1994, Wearing the Hijab in Contemporary Morocco: Choice and Identity, in Göçek, F. M. & Balaghi, S., Reconstructing Gender in the Middle East: Tradition, Identity & Power, New York, Columbia University Press
  28. ^ "Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement". Archived from the original on 2015-02-02.
  29. ^ Imani Jaafar-Mohammad, Esq.; Charlie Lehmann (April 11, 2011). "Women's Rights In Islam Regarding Marriage And Divorce". William Mitchell Journal of Law and Practice. Retrieved August 23, 2016.
  30. ^ a b c Kraemer, Ross Shepard. Her Share of the Blessings : Women's Religions among Pagans, Jews, and Christians in the Greco-Roman World. Oxford University Press, 1992.
  31. ^ Arthur, Marylin; D., H. (1977). "Politics and Pomegranates: An Interpretation of the Homeric Hymn to Demeter". Arethusa. 10 (1): 7–47. JSTOR 26307824.
  32. ^ Griffiths, Frederick. "Home Before Lunch: The Emancipated Woman in Theocritus," in Foley, Reflections of Women in Antiquity. 257.
  33. ^ "Evangelium Vitae (25 March 1995) – John Paul II". Archived from the original on 2015-02-12.
  34. ^ "BBC – Religions – Hinduism: Abortion".
  35. ^ Coward, Harold G.; Lipner, Julius; Young, Katherine K. (1 January 1989). Hindu Ethics: Purity, Abortion, and Euthanasia. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-88706-763-1.
  36. ^ "Christian views of homosexuality – ReligionFacts".
  37. ^ Kraemer, Christine Hoff (August 2012). "Gender and Sexuality in Contemporary Paganism: Gender and Sexuality in Contemporary Paganism". Religion Compass. 6 (8): 390–401. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8171.2012.00367.x.
  38. ^ Vanda Zajko (2009). "'Listening With' Ovid: Intersexuality, Queer Theory, and the Myth of Hermaphroditus and Salmacis". Helios. 36 (2): 175–202. doi:10.1353/hel.0.0023. S2CID 144301681.
  39. ^ "The insistence that equality is a western concept to be defended against the incursions of others relies on a continued deafness to resistant voices from outside Judaeo-Christian contexts. This, ironically, makes the self-proclaimed liberals who insist on this useful collaborators for authoritarian chauvinists from outside the west. For they are all in curious agreement that women's equality is a western concept and call for it, accordingly, to be either enforced (that's why we sent in the troops) or rejected (by keeping women secluded)." Priyamvada Gopal, "West has no monopoly on battle for gender equality Archived June 12, 2010, at the Wayback Machine", Kuwait Times September 30, 2007.
  40. ^ "These perceptions demonstrate a pattern of gender roles shaped by Western Judeo-Christian doctrine within the formal education curriculum, minimal inclusion of local history or cultural content, and loss of indigenous knowledge and practices. Gender-role change is one aspect of a general Westernizing effect of formal models of Western education on indigenous cultures." Jamaine Abidogun, "Western education's impact on Northern Igbo gender roles in Nsukka, Nigeria", Africa Today (2007).
  41. ^ de Vaus, David; McAllister, Ian (August 1987). "Gender Differences in Religion: A Test of the Structural Location Theory". American Sociological Review. 52 (4): 472. doi:10.2307/2095292. JSTOR 2095292.
  42. ^ "The Gender Gap in Religion Around the World". Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. 2016-03-22. Retrieved 2020-09-17.

External links[edit]

[1][2][3]

  1. ^ Lomax, Tamura (2018). Jezebel Unhinged: Loosing the Black Female Body in Religion and Culture. Durham: Duke University Press. ISBN 9781478002482.
  2. ^ Cuffel, Alexandra; Britt, Brian (2007). Religion, Gender, and Culture in the Pre-Modern World (Religion/Culture/Critique). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781403972187.
  3. ^ Beattie, Cordelia; Fenton, Kirsten A. (2011). Intersections of Gender, Religion and Ethnicity in the Middle Ages (Genders and Sexualities in History). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781349368341.