Economic liberalism Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_liberalism

Economic liberalism is a political and economic ideology that supports a market economy based on individualism and private property in the means of production.[1] Economic liberalism has been generally described as representing the economic expression of 19th-century liberalism until the Great Depression and rise of Keynesianism in the 20th century. An economy that is managed according to these precepts may be described as liberal capitalism or a liberal economy. Economic liberals tend to oppose government intervention and protectionism in the market economy when it inhibits free trade and competition but support government intervention to protect property rights and resolve market failures.[2]

Economic liberalism was born as the theory of economics of liberalism, developed during the Age of Enlightenment, particularly by Adam Smith, which advocates minimal interference by government in the economy. This was initially to promote the idea of private ownership and trade; however, due to a growing awareness of concerns regarding policy, economic liberalism paved the way for a new form of liberalism, known as social liberalism, which allowed for government intervention in order to help the poor. As a consequence, the widespread appeal of Smith's economic theories of free trade, the division of labour, and the principle of individual initiative has helped to obscure the rich body of political liberalism to be found in his work. This promoted the everyday man to hold ownership of his own property and trade, which slowly allowed for individuals to take control of their places within society. Economic liberalism is associated with markets and private ownership of capital assets. Historically, economic liberalism arose in response to feudalism and mercantilism. Today, economic liberalism is contrasted with protectionism because of its support for free trade and an open economy, and is also considered opposed to planned economies and non-capitalist economic orders, such as socialism.[3]

Initially, the economic liberals had to contend with the supporters of feudal privileges for the wealthy, traditions of the aristocracy and the rights of monarchs to run national economies in their own personal interests. By the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, these were largely defeated. Today, economic liberalism is associated with classical liberalism, neoliberalism, right-libertarianism, and some schools of conservatism like liberal conservatism and fiscal conservatism. They commonly adhere to a political and economic philosophy that advocates a restrained fiscal policy and a balanced budget through measures such as low taxes, reduced government spending, and minimized government debt.[4] Free trade, deregulation, tax cuts, privatization, labour market flexibility, and opposition to trade unions are also common positions.[5] Economic liberalism follows the same philosophical approach as classical liberalism and fiscal conservatism.[6]


Economic liberalism is a much broader concept than fiscal liberalism, which is called fiscal conservatism or economic libertarianism in the United States.[7] The ideology that highlighted the financial aspect of economic liberalism is called fiscal liberalism, which is defined as support for free trade.[8]


Adam Smith was an early advocate for economic liberalism.

Arguments in favor of economic liberalism were advanced during the Age of Enlightenment, opposing feudalism and mercantilism.[2] It was first analyzed by Adam Smith in An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), which advocated minimal interference of government in a market economy, although it did not necessarily oppose the state's provision of basic public goods.[9] In Smith's view, if everyone is left to his own economic devices instead of being controlled by the state, the result would be a harmonious and more equal society of ever-increasing prosperity.[1] This underpinned the move towards a capitalist economic system in the late 18th century and the subsequent demise of the mercantilist system. Private property and individual contracts form the basis of economic liberalism.[10]

The early theory of economic liberalism was based on the assumption that the economic actions of individuals are largely based on self-interest (invisible hand) and that allowing them to act without any restrictions will produce the best results for everyone (spontaneous order), provided that at least minimum standards of public information and justice exist, so that no one is allowed to coerce, steal, or commit fraud, and there should be freedom of speech and press. This ideology was well reflected in English law; Lord Ackner, denying the existence of a duty of good faith in English contract law, emphasised the "adversarial position of the parties when involved in negotiations".[11]

Position on state interventionism[edit]

Economic liberalism opposes government intervention in the economy when it leads to inefficient outcomes.[12] They are supportive of a strong state that protects the right to property and enforces contracts.[2] They may also support government interventions to resolve market failures.[2] Ordoliberalism and various schools of social liberalism based on classical liberalism include a broader role for the state but do not seek to replace private enterprise and the free market with public enterprise and economic planning.[13][14] A social market economy is a largely free-market economy based on a free price system and private property that is supportive of government activity to promote competition in markets and social welfare programs to address social inequalities that result from market outcomes.[13][14]

Historian Kathleen G. Donohue argues that classical liberalism in the United States during the 19th century had distinctive characteristics as opposed to Britain: "[A]t the center of classical liberal theory [in Europe] was the idea of laissez-faire. To the vast majority of American classical liberals, however, laissez-faire did not mean no government intervention at all. On the contrary, they were more than willing to see government provide tariffs, railroad subsidies, and internal improvements, all of which benefited producers. What they condemned was intervention in behalf of consumers."[15]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b Adams 2001, p. 20.
  2. ^ a b c d Oatley, Thomas (2019). International Political Economy: Sixth Edition. Routledge. pp. 25, 34–35. ISBN 978-1351034647. Archived from the original on 2021-07-21. Retrieved 2021-07-21.
  3. ^ Brown, Wendy (2005). Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge And Politics. Princeton University Press. p. 39.
  4. ^ Simmons, Beth A.; Dobbin, Frank; Garrett, Geoffrey (2006). "Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism". International Organization. 60 (4): 781–810. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060267. ISSN 1531-5088. S2CID 146351369.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  5. ^ Boudreaux, Don (2015-03-31). "Milton Friedman on the Real World Effects of Labor Unions". Cafe Hayek. Archived from the original on 2020-11-25. Retrieved 2020-10-13.
  6. ^ Gamble, Andrew (2013). "Neo-Liberalism and Fiscal Conservatism". In Thatcher, Mark; Schmidt, Vivien A. (eds.). Resilient Liberalism in Europe's Political Economy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 53–77. ISBN 978-1107041530. Archived from the original on 2021-07-26. Retrieved 2021-07-26.
  7. ^ Fujii, George (2013). "Liberalism". Encyclopedia of the Cold War. Routledge. ISBN 978-1135923112.
  8. ^ Peter Ghosh, Lawrence Goldman, ed. (2006). Politics and Culture in Victorian Britain: Essays in Memory of Colin Matthew. OUP Oxford. p. 56. ISBN 978-0191514449. Hence the emphasis today on the study of political economy, and the identification of Gladstone with 'fiscal liberalism', defined above all as the liberalism of free trade.
  9. ^ Aaron, Eric (2003). What's Right?. Dural, Australia: Rosenberg Publishing. p. 75.
  10. ^ Butler 2015, p. 10.
  11. ^ Walford v Miles [1992] 2 A.C. 128
  12. ^ Turner 2008, pp. 60–61.
  13. ^ a b Turner 2008, pp. 83–84.
  14. ^ a b Balaam & Dillman 2015, p. 48.
  15. ^ Donohue, Kathleen G. (2005). Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Idea of the Consumer. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-0801883910. Archived from the original on 2021-02-01. Retrieved 2016-12-03.


External links[edit]