mic_none

Democratic socialism Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism

Not to be confused with Socialist democracy.
This article is about socialism emphasising democracy. For the socialist ideology focusing on the humanisation of capitalism, see Social democracy.

Part of a series on
Socialism
Red flag waving.svg
Development
Ideas
Models
Variants
People
Organizations
Related topics
Lists
Part of a series on
Social democracy
Red rose 02.svg
History
Concepts
Variants
People
Organizations
By region
Related

Democratic socialism is a political philosophy that supports political democracy and some form of a socially owned economy,[1] with a particular emphasis on economic democracy, workplace democracy, and workers' self-management[2] within a market socialist economy, or an alternative form of decentralised planned socialist economy.[3] Democratic socialists argue that capitalism is inherently incompatible with the values of freedom, equality, and solidarity and that these ideals can only be achieved through the realisation of a socialist society.[4] Although most democratic socialists seek a gradual transition to socialism,[5] democratic socialism can support either revolutionary or reformist politics as means to establish socialism.[6] Democratic socialism was popularized by socialists who were opposed to the backsliding towards a one-party state in the Soviet Union and other nations during the 20th century.[7]

The history of democratic socialism can be traced back to 19th-century socialist thinkers across Europe and the Chartist movement in Britain, which somewhat differed in their goals but shared a common demand of democratic decision making and public ownership of the means of production, and viewed these as fundamental characteristics of the society they advocated for. In the late 19th to the early 20th century, democratic socialism was also heavily influenced by the gradualist form of socialism promoted by the British Fabian Society and Eduard Bernstein's evolutionary socialism in Germany.[8] Democratic socialism is what most socialists understand by the concept of socialism;[9] it may be a very broad (socialists who reject a one-party Marxist–Leninist state)[10] or more limited concept (post-war social democracy).[11] As a broad movement, it includes forms of libertarian socialism,[12] market socialism,[13] reformist socialism,[4] and revolutionary socialism,[14] as well as ethical socialism,[15] liberal socialism,[16] social democracy,[17] and some forms of state socialism[18] and utopian socialism,[19] all of which share commitment to democracy.[10]

Democratic socialism is contrasted with Marxism–Leninism, which opponents often perceive as being authoritarian and undemocratic in practice.[20] Democratic socialists oppose the Stalinist political system and the Soviet-type economic planning system, rejecting as their form of governance the administrative-command system that formed in the Soviet Union and other Marxist–Leninist states during the 20th century.[21] Democratic socialism is also distinguished from Third Way social democracy[22][nb 1] on the basis that democratic socialists are committed to systemic transformation of the economy from capitalism to socialism.[nb 2]

While having socialism as a long-term goal,[28] some moderate democratic socialists are more concerned about curbing capitalism's excesses, and are supportive of progressive reforms to humanise it in the present day,[29] while other democratic socialists believe that economic interventionism and similar policy reforms aimed at addressing social inequalities and suppressing the economic contradictions of capitalism would only exacerbate the contradictions,[30] causing them to emerge elsewhere under a different guise.[31] Those democratic socialists believe that the fundamental issues with capitalism are systemic in nature, and can only be resolved by replacing the capitalist mode of production with the socialist mode of production through the replacement of private ownership with collective ownership of the means of production, and extending democracy to the economic sphere in the form of industrial democracy.[32] The main criticism of democratic socialism is focused on the compatibility of democracy and socialism.[33] Several academics and political commentators tend to distinguish between authoritarian socialism and democratic socialism as a political ideology, with the first representing the Soviet Bloc, and the latter representing the democratic socialist parties in the Western Bloc countries that have been democratically elected in countries such as Britain, France, and Sweden, among others.[34] However, following the end of the Cold War, many of these countries have moved away from socialism as a neoliberal consensus replaced the social democratic consensus in the advanced capitalist world.[35][36][37][38]

Overview[edit]

Part of a series on
Libertarian socialism
Anarchist flag.svg
Political concepts
Economics
People
Philosophies and tendencies
Anarchist tendencies
Marxist tendencies
Other tendencies
Significant events
Related topics
Part of a series on
Marxism
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels
Theoretical works
Philosophy
Critique of political economy
Sociology
History
Aspects
Classical variants
Orthodox variants
Marxism–Leninism
Left communist variants
Libertarian variants
Other variants
People
Related topics
Related categories
Karl Marx

Democratic socialism is defined as having a socialist economy in which the means of production are socially and collectively owned or controlled,[2] alongside a liberal democratic political system of government.[39] Democratic socialists reject most self-described socialist states and Marxism–Leninism.[40] British Labour Party politician Peter Hain classifies democratic socialism along with libertarian socialism as a form of anti-authoritarian socialism from below (using the concept popularised by American socialist activist Hal Draper)[41] in contrast to authoritarian socialism and state socialism.[42] For Hain, this authoritarian and democratic divide is more important than that between reformists and revolutionaries.[43] In democratic socialism, it is the active participation of the population as a whole and workers in particular in the self-management of the economy that characterises socialism[2] while centralised economic planning[44] coordinated by the state and nationalisation do not represent socialism in itself.[45] A similar, more complex argument is made by Nicos Poulantzas.[46] For Draper, revolutionary-democratic socialism is a type of socialism from below, writing in The Two Souls of Socialism that "the leading spokesman in the Second International of a revolutionary-democratic Socialism-from-Below was Rosa Luxemburg, who so emphatically put her faith and hope in the spontaneous struggle of a free working class that the myth-makers invented for her a 'theory of spontaneity.'"[47] Similarly, he wrote about Eugene V. Debs that "'Debsian socialism' evoked a tremendous response from the heart of the people, but Debs had no successor as a tribune of revolutionary-democratic socialism."[48]

Some Marxist socialists emphasise Karl Marx's belief in democracy[49] and call themselves democratic socialists.[19] The Socialist Party of Great Britain and the World Socialist Movement define socialism in its classical formulation as a "system of society based upon the common ownership and democratic control of the means and instruments for producing and distributing wealth by and in the interest of the community."[50] Additionally, they include classlessness, statelessness and the abolition of wage labour as characteristics of a socialist society, characterising it as a stateless, propertyless, post-monetary economy based on calculation in kind, a free association of producers, workplace democracy and free access to goods and services produced solely for use and not for exchange.[51] Although these characteristics are usually reserved to describe a communist society,[52] this is consistent with the usage of Marx, Friedrich Engels and others, who referred to communism and socialism interchangeably.[53]

Definition[edit]

As a democratic socialist definition, the political scientist Lyman Tower Sargent states:

Democratic socialism can be characterised as follows:

  • Much property held by the public through a democratically elected government, including most major industries, utilities, and transportation systems
  • A limit on the accumulation of private property
  • Governmental regulation of the economy
  • Extensive publicly financed assistance and pension programs
  • Social costs and the provision of services added to purely financial considerations as the measure of efficiency

Publicly held property is limited to productive property and significant infrastructure; it does not extend to personal property, homes, and small businesses. And in practice in many democratic socialist countries, it has not extended to many large corporations.[54]

Another example is the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), with the organisation defining democratic socialism as a decentralised socially-owned economy and rejecting centralised, Soviet-type economic planning, stating:

Social ownership could take many forms, such as worker-owned cooperatives or publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives. Democratic socialists favour as much decentralisation as possible. While the large concentrations of capital in industries such as energy and steel may necessitate some form of state ownership, many consumer-goods industries might be best run as cooperatives. Democratic socialists have long rejected the belief that the whole economy should be centrally planned. While we believe that democratic planning can shape major social investments like mass transit, housing, and energy, market mechanisms are needed to determine the demand for many consumer goods.[55]

The DSA has been critical of self-described socialist states, arguing that "[j]ust because their bureaucratic elites called them 'socialist' did not make it so; they also called their regimes 'democratic.'"[56] While ultimately committed to instituting socialism, the DSA focuses the bulk of its political activities on reforms within capitalism, arguing: "As we are unlikely to see an immediate end to capitalism tomorrow, DSA fights for reforms today that will weaken the power of corporations and increase the power of working people."[57]

Labour Party politician Peter Hain, who identifies with libertarian socialism,[58] gives the following definition:

Democratic socialism should mean an active, democratically accountable state to underpin individual freedom and deliver the conditions for everyone to be empowered regardless of who they are or what their income is. It should be complemented by decentralisation and empowerment to achieve increased democracy and social justice. ... Today democratic socialism's task is to recover the high ground on democracy and freedom through maximum decentralisation of control, ownership and decision making. For socialism can only be achieved if it springs from below by popular demand. The task of socialist government should be an enabling one, not an enforcing one. Its mission is to disperse rather than to concentrate power, with a pluralist notion of democracy at its heart.[59]

Tony Benn, another prominent left-wing Labour Party politician,[60] described democratic socialism as a socialism that is "open, libertarian, pluralistic, humane and democratic; nothing whatever in common with the harsh, centralised, dictatorial and mechanistic images which are purposely presented by our opponents and a tiny group of people who control the mass media in Britain."[61]

Democratic socialism sometimes represents policies within capitalism as opposed to an ideology that aims to transcend and replace capitalism, although this is not always the case. Robert M. Page, a reader in Democratic Socialism and Social Policy at the University of Birmingham, wrote about transformative democratic socialism to refer to the politics of Labour Party Prime Minister Clement Attlee and its government (fiscal redistribution, some degree of public ownership and a strong welfare state) and revisionist democratic socialism as developed by Labour Party politician Anthony Crosland and Labour Party Prime Minister Harold Wilson, arguing:

The most influential revisionist Labour thinker, Anthony Crosland, contended that a more "benevolent" form of capitalism had emerged since the Second World War. ... According to Crosland, it was now possible to achieve greater equality in society without the need for "fundamental" economic transformation. For Crosland, a more meaningful form of equality could be achieved if the growth dividend derived from effective management of the economy was invested in "pro-poor" public services rather than through fiscal redistribution.[62]

The Socialist International, of which almost all democratic socialist, labourist and social democratic parties are members, declares the goal of the development of democratic socialism.[63] Some tendencies of democratic socialism advocate for social revolution in order to transition to socialism, distinguishing it from some forms of social democracy.[64] In Soviet politics, democratic socialism is the version of the Soviet Union model that was reformed in a democratic way. Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev described perestroika as building a "new, humane and democratic socialism."[65] Consequently, some former communist parties have rebranded themselves as being democratic socialists.[66] This include parties such as The Left in Germany,[67] a party succeeding the Party of Democratic Socialism which was itself the legal successor of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany.[68]

Democratic socialism and social democracy[edit]

Democratic socialism has occasionally been described as the form of social democracy prior to the displacement of Keynesianism by neoliberalism and monetarism which caused many social-democratic parties to adopt the Third Way ideology, accepting capitalism as the current status quo and powers that be, redefining socialism in a way that it maintained the capitalist structure intact.[25] The new version of Clause IV of the Labour Party Constitution, which was adopted by Tony Blair, uses democratic socialism to describe a modernised form of social democracy.[69] While affirming a commitment to democratic socialism,[70] it no longer definitely commits the party to public ownership of industry and in its place advocates "the enterprise of the market and the rigour of competition" along with "high quality public services ... either owned by the public or accountable to them."[70] Much like modern social democracy, some forms of democratic socialism follow a gradual, reformist or evolutionary path to socialism rather than a revolutionary one,[71] a tendency that is captured in the statement of Labour revisionist Anthony Crosland, who argued that the socialism of the pre-war world was now becoming increasingly irrelevant.[72] This tendency is invoked in an attempt to distinguish democratic socialism from Marxist–Leninist socialism as in Norman Thomas' Democratic Socialism: A New Appraisal,[73] Roy Hattersley's Choose Freedom: The Future of Democratic Socialism,[74] Malcolm Hamilton's Democratic Socialism in Britain and Sweden,[75] Jim Tomlinson's Democratic Socialism and Economic Policy: The Attlee Years, 1945–1951[76] and Donald F. Busky's Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey.[77] A variant of this set of definitions is Joseph Schumpeter's argument set out in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942)[78] that liberal democracies were evolving from liberal capitalism into democratic socialism with the growth of industrial democracy, regulatory institutions and self-management.[79]

Democratic socialism has some degree of significant overlaps on practical policy positions with social democracy,[80] although they are often distinguished from each other.[81] Policies commonly supported by democratic socialists are Keynesian in nature, including significant economic regulation alongside a mixed economy, extensive social insurance schemes, generous public pension programs and a gradual expansion of public ownership over strategic industries.[54] Policies such as free, universal health care and education are described as "pure Socialism" because they are opposed to "the hedonism of capitalist society."[82] Partly because of this overlap, some political commentators occasionally use the terms interchangeably.[83] One difference is that modern social democrats tend to reject revolutionary means accepted by more radical socialists.[84] Another difference is that social democrats are mainly concerned with practical reforms within capitalism, with socialism either relegated to the indefinite future, or are perceived to have abandoned it in the case of the Third Way.[85] More radical democratic socialists want to go beyond mere meliorist reforms and advocate systemic transformation of the mode of production from capitalism to socialism.[86]

While the Third Way has been described as a new social democracy[87] or neo-social democracy,[88] standing for a modernised social democracy[89] and competitive socialism,[90] the form of social democracy that remained committed to the gradual abolition of capitalism as well as social democrats opposed to the Third Way merged into democratic socialism.[91] During the late 20th century and early 21st century, these labels were embraced, contested and rejected due to the development within the European left of Eurocommunism between the 1970s and 1980s,[92] the rise of neoliberalism in the mid- to late 1970s,[93] the fall of the Soviet Union in December 1991 and of Marxist–Leninist governments between 1989 and 1992,[94] the rise and fall of the Third Way[25] between the 1970s[95] and 2010s[96] and the simultaneous rise of anti-austerity,[97] green,[98] left-wing populist[99] and Occupy[100] movements in the late 2000s and early 2010s due to the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and the Great Recession,[101] the causes of which have been widely attributed to the neoliberal shift[102] and deregulation economic policies.[103] This latest development contributed to the rise of politicians that represent a return to the post-war consensus social democracy such as Jeremy Corbyn in the United Kingdom and Bernie Sanders in the United States,[104] who assumed the democratic socialist label to describe their rejection of centrist politicians that supported triangulation within the Labour and Democratic parties such as with New Labour and the New Democrats, respectively.[105]

As social democracy originated as a revolutionary socialist or communist movement,[106] one distinction made to separate the modern versions of democratic socialism and social democracy is that the former can include revolutionary means[107] while the latter asserts that the only acceptable constitutional form of government is representative democracy under the rule of law.[108] Many social democrats "refer to themselves as socialists or democratic socialists" and some "use or have used these terms interchangeably."[109] Others argue that "there are clear differences between the three terms, and preferred to describe their own political beliefs by using the term 'social democracy' only."[110] In political science, democratic socialism and social democracy are occasionally seen as synonyms and as overlapping or otherwise not being mutually exclusive[111] while they are distinguished in journalistic use, in most cases sharply.[112] While social democrats continue to call and describe themselves as democratic socialists or simply socialists,[109] the meaning of democratic socialism and social democracy effectively reversed.[113] Democratic socialism originally represented socialism achieved by democratic means and usually resulted in reformism whereas social democracy included both reformist and revolutionary wings.[114] With the association of social democracy as policy regime[115] and the development of the Third Way,[25] social democracy became almost exclusively associated with capitalist welfare states,[116] while democratic socialism came to include communist and revolutionary tendencies.[117]

Political party[edit]

While most social-democratic parties describe themselves as democratic socialists, with democratic socialism representing the theory and social democracy the practice and vice versa, political scientists distinguish between the two. Social democratic is used for centre-left political parties,[118] "whose aim is the gradual amelioration of poverty and exploitation within a liberal capitalist society."[119] On the other hand, democratic socialist is used for left-wing socialist parties, including left-wing populist parties such as The Left, Podemos and Syriza.[120] This is reflected at the European party level, where the centre-left social democratic parties are within the Party of European Socialists and the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats, while left-wing democratic socialist and communist parties are within the Party of the European Left and the European United Left–Nordic Green Left.[121] Aside from democratic socialism, the latter also include communist tendencies and communist parties that embrace a left-libertarian form of communism.[122]

According to Steve Ludlam, "the arrival of New Labour signalled an unprecedented and possibly final assault on the party’s democratic socialist tradition, that is to say the tradition of those seeking the transformation of capitalism into socialism by overwhelmingly legislative means. ... It would be a while before some of the party's social democrats—those whose aim is the gradual amelioration of poverty and exploitation within a liberal capitalist society—began to fear the same threat to Labour's egalitarian tradition as the left recognised to its socialist tradition."[119] This was reflected similarly in Labour: A Tale of Two Parties by Hilary Wainwright.[123]

According to Andrew Mathers, Hilary Wainwright's 1987 work Labour: A Tale of Two Parties provided "a different reading which contrasted the 'ameliorative, pragmatic' social democratic tradition expressed principally in the Parliamentary Labour Party with a 'transformative, visionary' democratic socialist tradition associated mainly with the grassroots members engaged closely with extra-parliamentary struggles."[124]

Economics[edit]

Democratic socialists have promoted a variety of different models of socialism and economics, ranging from market socialism where socially owned enterprises operate in competitive markets and are self-managed by their workforce to non-market participatory socialism based on decentralised economic planning.[125] Democratic socialism is also committed to a decentralised form of economic planning, where productive units are integrated into a single organisation and organised on the basis of self-management.[21] Eugene V. Debs and Norman Thomas, both of whom were United States Presidential candidates for the Socialist Party of America, understood socialism to be an economic system structured upon production for use and social ownership in place of the for-profit system and private ownership of the means of production.[126] Democratic socialists and contemporary proponents of market socialism have argued that rather than socialism itself, the major reason for the economic shortcomings of Soviet-type economies were command economies. Their administrative-command system caused their failure to create rules and operational criteria for the efficient operation of state enterprises in their hierarchical allocation of resources and commodities and the lack of democracy in the political systems that the Soviet-type economies were combined with.[127]

Democratic planning[edit]

A democratic planned economy has been proposed as a basis for socialism and variously advocated by some democratic socialists who support a non-market form of socialism whilst rejecting Soviet-type central planning. It has been argued that decentralised planning allows for a spontaneously self-regulating system of stock control, relying solely on calculation in kind, to come about and that in turn decisively overcomes the objections raised by the economic calculation argument that any large scale economy must necessarily resort to a system of market prices.[128]

This form of economic planning implies some process of democratic and participatory decision-making within the economy and within firms itself in the form of industrial democracy. Computer-based forms of democratic economic planning and coordination between economic enterprises have also been proposed by various computer scientists and radical economists.[129] Proponents present democratic or decentralized and participatory economic planning as an alternative to market socialism for a post-capitalist society.[130]

Market socialism[edit]

Some proponents of market socialism see it as an economic system compatible with the political ideology of democratic socialism.[131] Advocates of market socialism such as Jaroslav Vaněk argue that genuinely free markets are impossible under conditions of private ownership of productive property. Vaněk contends that the class differences and unequal distribution of income and economic power that result from private ownership of industry enable the interests of the dominant class to skew the market in their favour, either in the form of monopoly and market power, or by utilising their wealth and resources to legislate government policies that benefit their specific business interests. Additionally, Vaněk states that workers in a socialist economy based on cooperative and self-managed enterprises have stronger incentives to maximise productivity because they would receive a share of the profits based on the overall performance of their enterprise, plus their fixed wage or salary.[132] Many pre-Marx socialists and proto-socialists were fervent anti-capitalists just as they were supporters of the free market, including the British philosopher Thomas Hodgskin, the French mutualist thinker and anarchist philosopher Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and the American philosophers Benjamin Tucker and Lysander Spooner, among others.[133] Although capitalism has been commonly conflated with the free market, there is a similar laissez-faire economic theory and system associated with socialism called left-wing laissez-faire[134] to distinguish it from laissez-faire capitalism.[135]

One example of this democratic market socialist tendency is mutualism, a democratic and libertarian socialist theory developed by Proudhon in the 18th century, from which individualist anarchism emerged. Benjamin Tucker is one eminent American individualist anarchist, who adopted a laissez-faire socialist system he termed anarchistic socialism as opposed to state socialism.[136] This tradition has been recently associated with contemporary scholars such as Kevin Carson,[137] Gary Chartier,[138] Charles W. Johnson,[139] Samuel Edward Konkin III,[140] Roderick T. Long,[141] Chris Matthew Sciabarra[142] and Brad Spangler,[143] who stress the value of radically free markets, termed freed markets to distinguish them from the common conception which these left-libertarians believe to be riddled with statism and bourgeois privileges.[144]

Sometimes referred to as left-wing market anarchists[145] proponents of this approach strongly affirm the classical liberal ideas of self-ownership and free markets while maintaining that taken to their logical conclusions these ideas support anti-capitalist, anti-corporatist, anti-hierarchical and pro-labour positions in economics, anti-imperialism in foreign policy and radically progressive views regarding sociocultural issues such as gender, sexuality and race.[146] Echoing the language of these market socialists, they maintain that radical market anarchism should be seen by its proponents and by others as part of the socialist tradition because of its heritage, emancipatory goals and potential and that market anarchists can and should call themselves socialists.[147] Critics of the free market and laissez-faire as commonly understood argue that socialism is fully compatible with a market economy and that a truly free-market or laissez-faire system would be anti-capitalist and socialist in practice.[134]

According to its supporters, this would result in the society as advocated by democratic socialists, when socialism is not understood as state socialism and conflated with self-described socialist states[148] and the free market and laissez-faire are understood to mean as being free from all forms of economic privilege, monopolies and artificial scarcities.[135] This is consistent with the classical economics view that economic rents, i.e. profits generated from a lack of perfect competition, must be reduced or eliminated as much as possible through free competition rather than free from regulation.[149] David McNally, a professor at the University of Houston, has argued in the Marxist tradition that the logic of the market inherently produces social inequality and leads to unequal exchanges, writing that Adam Smith's moral intent and moral philosophy espousing equal exchange was undermined by the practice of the free market he championed as the development of the market economy involved coercion, exploitation and violence that Smith's moral philosophy could not counteract. McNally criticises market socialists for believing in the possibility of fair markets based on equal exchanges to be achieved by purging parasitical elements from the market economy such as private ownership of the means of production, arguing that market socialism is an oxymoron when socialism is defined as an end to wage labour.[150]

Implementation[edit]

While socialism is commonly used to describe Marxism–Leninism and affiliated states and governments, there have also been several anarchist and socialist societies that followed democratic socialist principles, encompassing anti-authoritarian and democratic anti-capitalism.[151] The most notable historical examples are the Paris Commune, the various soviet republics established in the post-World War I period, early Soviet Russia before the abolition of soviet councils by the Bolsheviks, Revolutionary Catalonia as noted by George Orwell,[152] and the Federation of Rojava in Northern Syria.[153] Other examples include the kibbutz communities in modern-day Israel,[154] Marinaleda in Spain,[155] the Zapatistas of EZLN in the region of Chiapas,[156] and to some extent the workers' self-management policies within the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Cuba.[157] However, the best-known example is that of Chile under President Salvador Allende,[158] who was violently overthrown in a military coup funded and backed by the CIA in 1973.[159]

When nationalisation of large industries was relatively widespread during the Keynesian post-war consensus, it was not uncommon for some political commentators to describe several European countries as democratic socialist states seeking to move their countries towards a socialist economy.[160] In 1956, leading British Labour Party politician Anthony Crosland claimed that capitalism had been abolished in Britain, although others such as Welshman Aneurin Bevan, Minister of Health in the first post-war Labour government and the architect of the National Health Service, disputed the claim that Britain was a socialist state.[161] For Crosland and others who supported his views, Britain was a socialist state. According to Bevan, Britain had a socialist National Health Service, which stood in opposition to the hedonism of Britain's capitalist society.[82] Although the laws of capitalism still operated fully as in the rest of Europe and private enterprise dominated the economy,[162] several political commentators claimed that during the post-war period, when socialist parties were in power, countries such as Britain and France were democratic socialist states, and the same claim is now applied to Nordic countries with the Nordic model.[163] In the 1980s, the government of President François Mitterrand aimed to expand dirigisme by attempting to nationalise all French banks, but this attempt faced opposition from the European Economic Community, which demanded a capitalist free-market economy among its members.[164] Nevertheless, public ownership in France and the United Kingdom during the height of nationalisation in the 1960s and 1970s never accounted for more than 15–20% of capital formation.[162]

The form of socialism practised by parties such as the Singaporean People's Action Party during its first few decades in power was of a pragmatic kind, as it was characterised by its rejection of mass nationalisation. The party still claimed to be a socialist party, pointing out its extensive regulation of the private sector, activist intervention in the economy and its social welfare policies as evidence of this claim.[165] Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew stated that he has been influenced by the democratic socialist factions of the British Labour Party.[166] Those confusions and disputes are caused not only by the socialist definition, but by the capitalist definition as well. Christian democrats, social liberals, national and social conservatives tend to support social democratic policies and generally see capitalism compatible with a mixed economy, while classical liberals, conservative liberals, liberal conservatives, neoliberals and right-libertarians define capitalism as a purely free market economy. Those economic liberals support a small government, laissez-faire, and deregulated capitalist market economy, while opposing all democratic socialist policies as well as economic interventionism and government regulations.[167] According to them, the negative effects of actually existing capitalism are caused by "corporatism", "corporatocracy", or "crony capitalism".[168]

Socialism has often been erroneously conflated with an administrative command economy, authoritarian socialism, a big government, Marxist–Leninist states, Soviet-type economic planning, state interventionism and state socialism.[167] Austrian School economists such as Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises continually used socialism as a synonym for central planning and state socialism, falsely conflating it with fascism and opposing democratic socialist policies, including the welfare state.[169] This is especially true in the United States, where socialism has become a pejorative used by conservatives and right-libertarians to taint liberal and progressive policies, proposals and public figures.[170]

Philosophy[edit]

Karl Marx, whose thought influenced the development of democratic socialism, with some endorsing it and others rejecting it[nb 3]

Democratic socialism involves the entire population controlling the economy through some type of democratic system, with the idea that the means of production are owned and managed by the working class as a whole.[2] The interrelationship between democracy and socialism extends far back into the socialist movement to The Communist Manifesto's emphasis on winning as a first step the "battle of democracy",[172] with Karl Marx writing that democracy is "the road to socialism."[173] Socialist thinkers as diverse as Eduard Bernstein, Karl Kautsky, Vladimir Lenin and Rosa Luxemburg[174] also wrote that democracy is indispensable to the realisation of socialism.[175] Philosophical support for democratic socialism can be found in the works of political philosophers such as Axel Honneth and Charles Taylor. Honneth has put forward the view that political and economic ideologies have a social basis, meaning they originate from intersubjective communication between members of a society. Honneth criticises the liberal state and ideology because it assumes that principles of individual liberty and private property are ahistorical and abstract when in fact they evolved from a specific social discourse on human activity. In contrast to liberal individualism, Honneth has emphasised the intersubjective dependence between humans, namely that human well-being depends on recognising others and being recognised by them. With an emphasis on community and solidarity, democratic socialism can be seen as a way of safeguarding this dependency.[176]

While socialism is frequently used to describe socialist states and Soviet-style economies, especially in the United States due to the First and Second Red Scares, democratic socialists use socialism to refer to their own tendency that rejects the ideas of authoritarian socialism and state socialism as socialism,[40] regarding them as a form of state capitalism in which the state undertakes commercial economic activity and where the means of production are organised and managed as state-owned enterprises, including the processes of capital accumulation, centralised management and wage labour.[177] Democratic socialists include those socialists who are opposed to Marxism–Leninism and social democrats who are committed to the abolishment of capitalism in favour of socialism and the institution of a post-capitalist economy.[40] According to Andrew Lipow, thus wrote in 1847 the editors of the Journal of the Communist League, directly influenced by Marx and Friedrich Engels, whom Lipow describes as "the founders of modern revolutionary democratic socialism":

We are not among those communists who are out to destroy personal liberty, who wish to turn the world into one huge barrack or into a gigantic workhouse. There certainly are some communists who, with an easy conscience, refuse to countenance personal liberty and would like to shuffle it out of the world because they consider that it is a hindrance to complete harmony. But we have no desire to exchange freedom for equality. We are convinced that in no social order will freedom be assured as in a society based upon communal ownership.[178]

Theoretically and philosophically, socialism itself is democratic, seen as the highest democratic form by its proponents and at one point being one and the same with democracy.[179] Some argue that socialism implies democracy[180] and that democratic socialism is a redundant term.[181] However, others such as Michael Harrington argue that the term democratic socialism is necessary to distinguish it from that of the Soviet Union and other self-declared socialist states. For Harrington, the major reason for this was due to the perspective that viewed the Stalinist-era Soviet Union as having succeeded in propaganda in usurping the legacy of Marxism and distorting it in propaganda to justify its politics.[182] Both Leninism and Marxism–Leninism have emphasised democracy,[63] endorsing some form of democratic organisation of society and the economy whilst supporting democratic centralism, with Marxist–Leninists and others arguing that socialist states such as the Soviet Union were democratic.[183] Marxist–Leninists also tended to distinguish what they termed socialist democracy from democratic socialism, a term which they associated pejoratively to "reformism" and "social democracy."[184] Ultimately, they are considered outside the democratic socialist tradition.[20] On the other hand, anarchism (especially within its social anarchist tradition) and other ultra-left tendencies have been discussed within the democratic socialist tradition for their opposition to Marxism–Leninism and their support for more decentralised, direct forms of democracy.[185]

While both anarchists and ultra-left tendencies have rejected the label as they tend to associate it to reformist and statist forms of democratic socialism, they are considered revolutionary-democratic forms of socialism and some anarchists have referred to democratic socialism.[186] Some Trotskyist organisations such as the Australian Socialist Alliance, Socialist Alternative and Victorian Socialists or the French New Anticapitalist Party, Revolutionary Communist League and Socialism from below have described their form of socialism as democratic and have emphasised democracy in their revolutionary development of socialism.[187] Similarly, several Trotskyists have emphasised Leon Trotsky's revolutionary-democratic socialism.[188] Some such as Hal Draper spoke of "revolutionary-democratic socialism."[189] Those third camp revolutionary-democratic socialists advocated a socialist political revolution that would establish or re-establish socialist democracy in deformed or degenerated workers' states.[190] Draper also compared social democracy and Stalinism as two forms of socialism from above, contraposed to his own socialism from below as being the purer, more Marxist version of socialism.[189]

As a political tradition, democratic socialism represents a broad anti-Stalinist leftist and in some cases anti-Leninist strand within the socialist movement,[40] including anti-authoritarian socialism from below,[41] libertarian socialism,[12] market socialism,[3] Marxism[191] and certain left communist and ultra-left tendencies such as councilism and communisation as well as classical and libertarian Marxism.[192] It also includes the orthodox Marxism[193] related to Karl Kautsky[194] and Rosa Luxemburg[195] as well as the revisionism of Eduard Bernstein.[196] In addition, democratic socialism is related to the trend of Eurocommunism originating between the 1950s and 1980s,[197] referring to communist parties that adopted democratic socialism after Nikita Khrushchev's de-Stalinisation in 1956,[198] but also that of most communist parties since the 1990s.[199]

As a related ideology, classical social democracy is a form of democratic socialism.[200] Social democracy underwent various major forms throughout its history and is distinguished between the early trend[201] that supported revolutionary socialism,[202] mainly related to Marx and Engels[203] as well as other notable social-democratic politicians and orthodox Marxist thinkers such as Bernstein,[196] Kautsky,[194] Luxemburg[195] and Lenin,[204] including more democratic and libertarian interpretations of Leninism;[205] the revisionist trend adopted by Bernstein and other reformist socialist leaders between the 1890s and 1940s;[206] the post-war trend[201] that adopted or endorsed Keynesian welfare capitalism[207] as part of a compromise between capitalism and socialism;[208] and those opposed to the Third Way.[25]

Views on compatibility of democracy and socialism[edit]

Support[edit]

One of the major scholars who have argued that socialism and democracy are compatible is the Austrian-born American economist Joseph Schumpeter, who was hostile to socialism.[209] In his book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942), Schumpeter emphasised that "political democracy was thoroughly compatible with socialism in its fullest sense",[210] although it has been noted that he did not believe that democracy was a good political system and advocated republican values.[33]

In a 1963 address to the All India Congress Committee, Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru stated: "Political democracy has no meaning if it does not embrace economic democracy. And economic democracy is nothing but socialism."[211]

Political historian Theodore Draper wrote: "I know of no political group which has resisted totalitarianism in all its guises more steadfastly than democratic socialists."[33]

Historian and economist Robert Heilbroner argued that "[t]here is, of course, no conflict between such a socialism and freedom as we have described it; indeed, this conception of socialism is the very epitome of these freedoms", referring to open association of individuals in political and social life; the democratization and humanization of work; and the cultivation of personal talents and creativity.[33]

Bayard Rustin, long-time member of the Socialist Party of America and National Chairman of the Social Democrats, USA, wrote: "For me, socialism has meaning only if it is democratic. Of the many claimants to socialism only one has a valid title—that socialism which views democracy as valuable per se, which stands for democracy unequivocally, and which continually modifies socialist ideas and programs in the light of democratic experience. This is the socialism of the labor, social-democratic, and socialist parties of Western Europe."[33]

Economist and political theorist Kenneth Arrow argued: "We cannot be sure that the principles of democracy and socialism are compatible until we can observe a viable society following both principles. But there is no convincing evidence or reasoning which would argue that a democratic-socialist movement is inherently self-contradictory. Nor need we fear that gradual moves in the direction of increasing government intervention will lead to an irreversible move to 'serfdom.'"[33]

Journalist William Pfaff wrote: "It might be argued that socialism ineluctably breeds state bureaucracy, which then imposes its own kinds of restrictions upon individual liberties. This is what the Scandinavians complain about. But Italy's champion bureaucracy owes nothing to socialism. American bureaucracy grows as luxuriantly and behaves as officiously as any other."[33]

Opposition[edit]

Some politicians, economists, and theorists have argued that socialism and democracy are incompatible. According to them, history is full of instances of self-declared socialist states that at one point were committed to the values of personal liberty, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of association, but then found themselves clamping down on such freedoms as they end up being viewed as inconvenient or contrary towards their political or economic goals.[33] Chicago School economist Milton Friedman argued that a "society which is socialist cannot also be democratic" in the sense of "guaranteeing individual freedom."[33] Sociologist Robert Nisbet, a philosophical conservative who began his career as a leftist, argued in 1978 that there is "not a single free socialism to be found anywhere in the world."[33]

Neoconservative Irving Kristol argued: "Democratic socialism turns out to be an inherently unstable compound, a contradiction in terms. Every social democratic party, once in power, soon finds itself choosing, at one point after another, between the socialist society it aspires to and the liberal society that lathered it." Kristol added that "socialist movements end up [in] a society where liberty is the property of the state, and is (or is not) doled out to its citizens along with other contingent 'benefits'."[33]

Similarly, anti-communist academic Richard Pipes argued: "The merger of political and economic power implicit in socialism greatly strengthens the ability of the state and its bureaucracy to control the population. Theoretically, this capacity need not be exercised and need not lead to growing domination of the population by the state. In practice, such a tendency is virtually inevitable. For one thing, the socialization of the economy must lead to a numerical growth of the bureaucracy required to administer it, and this process cannot fail to augment the power of the state. For another, socialism leads to a tug of war between the state, bent on enforcing its economic monopoly, and the ordinary citizen, equally determined to evade it; the result is repression and the creation of specialized repressive organs."[33]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Sinclair 1918; Busky 2000, p. 7; Abjorensen 2019, p. 115.
  2. ^ a b c d Edelstein 1993.
  3. ^ a b Anderson & Herr 2007, p. 448.
  4. ^ a b Alt et al. 2010, p. 401.
  5. ^ Busky 2000, p. 10.
  6. ^ Alt et al. 2010, p. 401; Abjorensen 2019, p. 115.
  7. ^ Williams 1985, p. 289; Foley 1994, p. 23; Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Busky 2000, pp. 7–8.
  8. ^ Bernstein 1907; Cole 1961; Steger 1997.
  9. ^ Sinclair 1918; Busky 2000, pp. 7–8.
  10. ^ a b Busky 2000, pp. 7–8; Prychitko 2002, p. 72.
  11. ^ Hamilton 1989; Pierson 2005; Page 2007.
  12. ^ a b Draper 1966, pp. 57–84; Hain 1995; Hain 2000, p. 118.
  13. ^ Hain 1995; Anderson & Herr 2007, p. 448.
  14. ^ Draper 1966, "The "Revisionist" Facade", "The 100% American Scene"; Alt et al. 2010, p. 401.
  15. ^ Dearlove & Saunders 2000; Gaus & Kukathas 2004, p. 420; Thompson 2006.
  16. ^ Adams 1999, p. 127; Gaus & Kukathas 2004, p. 420.
  17. ^ Williams 1985, p. 289; Foley 1994, p. 23; Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Busky 2000, pp. 7–8; Sargent 2008, pp. 117–118.
  18. ^ Busky 2000, p. 93.
  19. ^ a b c Sargent 2008, p. 118.
  20. ^ a b Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Busky 2000, pp. 7–8; Prychitko 2002, p. 72.
  21. ^ a b Prychitko 2002, p. 72.
  22. ^ Whyman 2005, pp. 1–5, 61, 215.
  23. ^ March 2008.
  24. ^ Lewis & Surender 2004, pp. 3–4, 16.
  25. ^ a b c d e Barrientos & Powell 2004, pp. 9–26; Cammack 2004, pp. 151–166; Romano 2006; Hinnfors 2006; Lafontaine 2009; Corfe 2010.
  26. ^ Romano 2007, p. 114.
  27. ^ Adams 1999, p. 127.
  28. ^ Roemer 1994, pp. 25–27; Berman 1998, p. 57; Bailey 2009, p. 77; Lamb 2015, pp. 415–416.
  29. ^ Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Alt et al. 2010, p. 401.
  30. ^ Clarke 1981; Bardhan & Roemer 1992, pp. 101–116; Weisskopf 1994, pp. 297–318.
  31. ^ Ticktin 1998, pp. 55–80; Hinnfors 2006; Schweickart 2007, p. 447.
  32. ^ Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Anderson & Herr 2007, p. 447; Schweickart 2007, p. 448; Alt et al. 2010, p. 401.
  33. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Barrett 1978.
  34. ^ Barrett 1978; Heilbroner 1991; Kendall 2011, pp. 125–127; Li 2015, pp. 60–69.
  35. ^ Sanandaji, Nima. "Nordic Countries Aren't Actually Socialist". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 2022-04-20.
  36. ^ "The end of the French left". POLITICO. 2022-01-13. Retrieved 2022-04-20.
  37. ^ "Socialism declining in Europe as populism support grows". The Independent. 2019-12-28. Retrieved 2022-04-20.
  38. ^ Steven Best; Richard Kahn; Anthony J. Nocella II; Peter McLaren, eds. (2011). "Introduction: Pathologies of Power and the Rise of the Global Industrial Complex". The Global Industrial Complex: Systems of Domination. Rowman & Littlefield. p. xviii. ISBN 978-0739136980.
  39. ^ Sinclair 1918; Busky 2000, p. 7; Anderson & Herr 2007, pp. 445–448; Abjorensen 2019, p. 115.
  40. ^ a b c d Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Busky 2000, pp. 7–8; Prychitko 2002, p. 72; Alt et al. 2010, p. 401.
  41. ^ a b Draper 1966, pp. 57–84.
  42. ^ Hain 2000.
  43. ^ Hain 1995.
  44. ^ Wilhelm 1985, pp. 118–130; Ellman 2007, p. 22.
  45. ^ Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Busky 2000, pp. 7–8; Alistair & Pyper 2000, p. 677; Prychitko 2002, p. 72; Alt et al. 2010, p. 401.
  46. ^ Poulantzas 1978.
  47. ^ Draper 1966, "The "Revisionist" Facade".
  48. ^ Draper 1966, "The 100% American Scene".
  49. ^ Megill 1970, p. 45; Draper 1974, pp. 101–124; Jossa 2010, pp. 335–354; Sarkar 2019.
  50. ^ Barker 2019, "Chapter V. The Aims and Policy of the Socialists".
  51. ^ Socialist Party of Great Britain (Our Object and Declaration of Principles); Socialist Party of Great Britain (FAQ); Socialist Party of Great Britain (What is Socialism?).
  52. ^ Marx 1875, "Part I".
  53. ^ Steele 1992, pp. 44–45; Hudis et al. 2008.
  54. ^ a b Sargent 2008, p. 117.
  55. ^ Democratic Socialists of America (FAQ), "Doesn't socialism mean that the government will own and run everything?".
  56. ^ Democratic Socialists of America (FAQ), "Hasn't socialism been discredited by the collapse of Communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe?".
  57. ^ Democratic Socialists of America (About).
  58. ^ Hain 1995; Hain 2000.
  59. ^ Hain 2015, pp. 133–148.
  60. ^ Hall 2011, p. 45; White 2014.
  61. ^ Benn & Mullin 1979.
  62. ^ Page 2007.
  63. ^ a b Busky 2000, p. 8.
  64. ^ Edelstein 1993; Alt et al. 2010, p. 401; Abjorensen 2019, p. 115.
  65. ^ Christensen 1990, pp. 123–146.
  66. ^ Sargent 2008, p. 118; Lamb 2015, p. 415.
  67. ^ Borragan & Cini 2013, p. 387; Nordsieck 2017.
  68. ^ Tangian 2013, p. 321.
  69. ^ Lowe 2004; Romano 2007, p. 3; Ludlam & Smith 2017, p. 3.
  70. ^ a b Adams 1998, pp. 144–145.
  71. ^ Busky 2000, p. 10; Heywood 2012, p. 97.
  72. ^ Hamilton 1989; Pierson 2005, pp. 145–163.
  73. ^ Thomas 1953.
  74. ^ Hattersley 1987.
  75. ^ Hamilton 1989.
  76. ^ Tomlinson 1997.
  77. ^ Busky 2000.
  78. ^ Schumpeter 1942.
  79. ^ Medearis 1997.
  80. ^ Denitch 1981; Picard 1985; Foley 1994, p. 23; Busky 2000, p. 8; Heywood 2012, p. 97; Sunkara 2020.
  81. ^ Edelstein 1993; Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 100; Busky 2000, p. 8; Anderson & Herr 2007; Alt et al. 2010; Sunkara 2020.
  82. ^ a b Bevan 1952, p. 106.
  83. ^ Sargent 2008, p. 117; Heywood 2012, p. 97; Hain 2015, p. 3.
  84. ^ Abjorensen 2019.
  85. ^ Berman 1998, p. 57; Bailey 2009, p. 77.
  86. ^ Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Anderson & Herr 2007, p. 447; Alt et al. 2010, p. 401.
  87. ^ Gamble & Wright 1999, p. 6; Fitzpatrick 2003; Bailey 2009, pp. 14–17; Meyer & Rutherford 2011, "The Third Way and Its Vision of Social Democracy"; Taylor 2013, p. 133.
  88. ^ Walters 2001, p. 66; Katseli, Milios & Pelagidis 2018.
  89. ^ Lowe 1993; Romano 2006, p. 3; Ludlam & Smith 2017, p. 3.
  90. ^ Döring 2007, p. 3.
  91. ^ Lafontaine 2009.
  92. ^ Laqueur 1976; Boggs & Plotke 1980; Johari 1987, pp. 664–694; Di Donato 2015, pp. 193–211.
  93. ^ Palley 2004; Harvey 2005; Palley 2005; Johnston & Saad-Filho 2005; Cahill et al. 2018; Ratner 2019.
  94. ^ Heilbroner 1991, pp. 96–110; Kumar 1992, pp. 309–356; Pierson 1995, pp. 64–78; Tismaneanu 2009, pp. 309–356.
  95. ^ Humphrys 2018.
  96. ^ Guinan 2013; Barbieri 2017; Karnitschnig 2018; Buck 2018; Lawson 2018.
  97. ^ Magstadt 2016, p. 36; March 2016; Calossi 2016; Fuchs 2017, p. 109; Cole 2017.
  98. ^ Gilk 2008.
  99. ^ Allen 2009; Benedetto, Hix & Mastrorocco 2019; Blombäck et al. 2019; Berman & Snegovaya 2019; Agustín 2020, pp. 13–32.
  100. ^ Griffiths & Millei 2012, p. viii; Kwok & Rieger 2013, p. 40; Berberoglu 2018, p. 341.
  101. ^ Dionne & Galtson 2019; Cassidy 2019; Kvitrud 2019; Sears 2019, p. 243.
  102. ^ Bresser-Pereira 2010; Howard 2012; Welch 2012; De Vogli & Owusu 2015; Sitaraman 2019.
  103. ^ Palley 2013; Amadeo 2019.
  104. ^ Tarnoff 2017.
  105. ^ Huges 2016.
  106. ^ Ely 1883, pp. 204–205.
  107. ^ Duignan, Kalsang Bhutia & Mahajan 2009; Abjorensen 2019, p. 115.
  108. ^ Hinchman & Meyer 2007, p. 91.
  109. ^ a b O'Reilly 2007, p. 91; Raza 2012, p. 86; Gage 2018.
  110. ^ Brandal, Bratberg & Thorsen 2013, p. 7.
  111. ^ Busky 2000, p. 8; Sargent 2008, p. 118; Heywood 2012, p. 97; Hain 2015, p. 3.
  112. ^ Qiu 2015; Barro 2015; Tupy 2016; Cooper 2018; Rodriguez 2018; Levitz, April 2019.
  113. ^ Eatwell & Wright 1999, "Social Democracy and Democratic Socialism".
  114. ^ Ely 1883, pp. 204–205; Eatwell & Wright 1999, "Democratic Socialism and Social Democracy"; Ludlam & Smith 2017, p. 5.
  115. ^ Ludlam & Smith 2017, pp. 1–15.
  116. ^ Eatwell & Wright 1999, p. 80; Ludlam & Smith 2017, p. 5.
  117. ^ Busky 2000, pp. 8–10; Sargent 2008, p. 117; Alt et al. 2010, p. 401; Abjorensen 2019, p. 115.
  118. ^ Considère-Charondu 2010, p. 157; Staab 2011, p. 67.
  119. ^ a b Ludlam 2000, pp. 264–276.
  120. ^ Della Porta et al. 2017.
  121. ^ Nordsieck 2019.
  122. ^ Casier & Jongerden 2010, p. 203; Trechsel 2013, p. 72.
  123. ^ Wainwright 1987.
  124. ^ Mathers 2017, pp. 389–444.
  125. ^ Prychitko 2002, p. 72; Anderson & Herr 2007, p. 448.
  126. ^ Debs 1912; Thomas 1936.
  127. ^ Gregory & Stuart 2003, p. 152.
  128. ^ Schweickart 2007, p. 448.
  129. ^ Lange 1979; Cockshott & Cottrell 1993; Medina 2006, pp. 571–606.
  130. ^ Kotz 2008.
  131. ^ Miller 1990.
  132. ^ Perkins 2016.
  133. ^ Braudel 1979.
  134. ^ a b Manley 2014 (Part One); Manley 2014 (Part Two).
  135. ^ a b Carson 2009; Chartier & Johnson 2011.
  136. ^ Tucker 1972; Brown 1997, p. 107.
  137. ^ Carson 2008; Carson 2010.
  138. ^ Chartier 2009.
  139. ^ Johnson 2008, pp. 155–188.
  140. ^ Long 2012, p. 227.
  141. ^ Long 2000; Kuskowski 2008.
  142. ^ Sciabarra 2000.
  143. ^ Spangler 2006.
  144. ^ Gillis 2011, pp. 19–20.
  145. ^ Chartier & Johnson 2011; Zwolinski 2013.
  146. ^ Chartier & Johnson 2011.
  147. ^ Chartier 2009 (Socialist Ends, Market Means); Chartier 2010; Chartier 2010 (Speech).
  148. ^ Campbell 2009, p. 95; Stossel 2010; Kristof 2011.
  149. ^ Popper 1994.
  150. ^ McNally 1993.
  151. ^ Waxman 2018.
  152. ^ Orwell 1980, pp. 4–6.
  153. ^ Ramnath 2019, p. 691.
  154. ^ Goldenberg & Wekerle 1972, pp. 224–232.
  155. ^ Hancox 2013.
  156. ^ Esteva 2013; Vidal 2018.
  157. ^ Al Jazeera 2019.
  158. ^ Mabry 1975; BBC 2003; Patsouras 2005, p. 265.
  159. ^ Harvey 2005, p. 7.
  160. ^ Barrett 1978; Heilbroner 1991, pp. 96–110; Kendall 2011, p. 125; Li 2015, p. 69.
  161. ^ Socialist Party of Great Britain 1958; Crosland 2006, pp. 9, 89.
  162. ^ a b Batson 2017.
  163. ^ Barrett 1978; Heilbroner 1991, pp. 96–110; Kendall 2011, pp. 125–127; Li 2015, pp. 60–69.
  164. ^ Cobham 1984; Cohen 2010.
  165. ^ Morley 1993.
  166. ^ Kerr 1999.
  167. ^ a b Campbell 2009, p. 95.
  168. ^ Stossel 2010; Kristof 2011; Chartier 2018.
  169. ^ Mises 1936; Hayek 1944; Mises 1962.
  170. ^ Truman 1952; Jackson 2012; Astor 2019.
  171. ^ Megill 1970, p. 45.
  172. ^ Engels & Marx 1848, p. 52.
  173. ^ Arora 2017.
  174. ^ Luxemburg 1900, "Co-operatives, Unions, Democracy", "Conquest of Political Power"; Draper 1966, "The "Revisionist" Facade".
  175. ^ Isakhan 2015, p. 354.
  176. ^ Honneth 1995, pp. 231–247.
  177. ^ Chomsky 1986; Howard & King 2001, pp. 110–126; Wolff 2015.
  178. ^ Lipow 1991, p. 1.
  179. ^ Link 1968, pp. 559–562, "Socialism and Democracy"; Pestritto 2005, pp. 77–78, "Socialism and Democracy"; Schweickart 2006.
  180. ^ Socialist Party USA.
  181. ^ Sinclair 1918; Laclau & Mouffe 1985; Busky 2000, pp. 7–8.
  182. ^ Harrington 2011, p. 162.
  183. ^ Webb & Webb 1935; Sloan 1937; Farber 1992; Getzler 2002.
  184. ^ Busky 2000, p. 8; Panfilov 1979.
  185. ^ Draper 1966, pp. 57–84; Poulantzas 1978; Hain 1995; Hain 2000, p. 118.
  186. ^ Dongyoun 2016, pp. 171–174.
  187. ^ Murray 2001; Debbaut 2007; Agence France-Presse 2008; Socialist Alternative; Victorian Socialists 2019.
  188. ^ Taaffe 2019.
  189. ^ a b Draper 1966.
  190. ^ Lipow 1991, p. 1; LeBlanc 2014, p. 202; Internationalist Marxist Tendency.
  191. ^ Draper 1966; Prychitko 2002, p. 72.
  192. ^ Draper 1966; Poulantzas 1978.
  193. ^ Bookchin 1998, p. 284.
  194. ^ a b Muldoon 2019; Post 2019; Blanc 2019; Kalsang Bhutia & Veenu 2019.
  195. ^ a b Draper 1966, "The "Revisionist" Facade"; Starke 2020.
  196. ^ a b Bernstein 1907; Steger 1997; Angel 2020.
  197. ^ Timmermann 1977, pp. 376–385; Azcárate 1978, "What Is Eurocommunism?"; Ranadive 1978, pp. 3–35; Devlin 1979, pp. 81–107; Spieker 1980, pp. 427–464.
  198. ^ Godson & Haseler 1978; Bracke 2013, pp. 168–170; Kindersley 2016.
  199. ^ Busky 2000, p. 7; Sargent 2008, p. 117; Bailey 2009, p. 77.
  200. ^ Thomas 1953; Hattersley 1987; Hamilton 1989; Tomlinson 1997; Busky 2000, pp. 7–8; Pierson 2005; Sargent 2008, pp. 117–118.
  201. ^ a b Miller 1998, p. 827.
  202. ^ Ely 1883, pp. 204–205; Lamb 2015, pp. 415–416.
  203. ^ Duignan, Kalsang Bhutia & Mahajan 2016.
  204. ^ Lamb 2015, pp. 415–416; Sunkara 2020.
  205. ^ Lih 2003, pp. 5–49; Brown 2004, p. 3; Lih 2005; Craig 2006; Schulman 2016.
  206. ^ Draper 1966, "The "Revisionist" Facade"; Duignan, Kalsang Bhutia & Mahajan 2009.
  207. ^ Wright 1999, pp. 80–103; Fitzpatrick 2003, pp. 2–3.
  208. ^ Egle et al. 2008, p. 10; Harrington 2011, p. 93.
  209. ^ Horwitz 1994, p. 255.
  210. ^ Schumpeter 1942; Medearis 1997.
  211. ^ Bilgrami 1965, pp. 26–31.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ "The far left is becoming the principal challenge to mainstream social democratic parties, in large part because its main parties are no longer extreme, but present themselves as defending the values and policies that social democrats have allegedly abandoned."[23]
  2. ^ Social democratic proponents of the Third Way were more concerned about challenging the New Right to win back government power.[24] This has resulted in analysts and critics arguing that they endorsed capitalism, even if it was due to recognising that outspoken anti-capitalism in these circumstances was politically nonviable, or that it was not only anti-socialist and neoliberal but anti-social democratic in practice.[25] Some observers maintain this was the result of their type of reformism that caused them to administer the system according to capitalist logic,[26] while others saw it as a modern liberal form of democratic socialism within the context of market socialism, and distinguish it from classical democratic socialism.[27]
  3. ^ "Democratic Marxism is authentic Marxism — the Marxism which emphasizes the necessity for revolutionary action. Loyalty to the movement, not loyalty to any particular doctrine, is characteristic of the orthodox democratic Marxist."[171] "There is considerable controversy among scholars regarding Marx's own attitude toward democracy, but two lines of thought developed from Marx: one emphasizing democracy and one, the dominant line, rejecting it."[19]

Sources[edit]

Books[edit]

  • Abjorensen, Norman (15 June 2019). Historical Dictionary of Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781538120743.
  • Adam, Christopher; Egervari, Tibor; Laczko, Leslie; Young, Judy (2010). The 1956 Hungarian Revolution: Hungarian and Canadian Perspectives. University of Ottawa Press. ISBN 9780776607054.
  • Adams, Ian (1998). Ideology and Politics in Britain Today. Politics Today (illustrated, reprint ed.). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press. ISBN 9780719050565.
  • Adams, Ian (1999). "Social democracy to New Labour". Political Ideology Today. Politics Today. Manchester University Press. ISBN 9780719050565.
  • Agustín, Óscar García (2020). Left-Wing Populism: The Politics of the People. Emerald Group Publishing. ISBN 9781839092039.
  • Alistair, Mason; Pyper, Hugh (2000). Hastings, Adrian (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198600244.
  • Almeida, Dimitri (2012). The Impact of European Integration on Political Parties: Beyond the Permissive Consensus. Routledge. ISBN 9780415693745.
  • Anderson, Gary L.; Herr, Kathryn G. (2007). Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice. SAGE Publications. ISBN 9781412918121.
  • Appel, Hilary; Orenstein, Mitchell A. (2018). From Triumph to Crisis: Neoliberal Economic Reform in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108435055.
  • Arora, N. D. (2017). Political Science for Civil Services Mains Examination. McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 9789385965890.
  • Artemio, Guillermo (2012). Historical Dictionary of the Philippines. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 9780810872462.
  • Aspalter, Christian (2001). Importance of Christian and Social Democratic Movements in Welfare Politics: With Special Reference to Germany, Austria and Sweden. Huntington, New York: Nova Science Publishers. ISBN 9781560729754.
  • Avrich, Paul (1970). Kronstadt 1921. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691087214.
  • Azcárate, Manuel (1978). "What Is Eurocommunism?". In Urban, George (ed.). Eurocommunism. Maurice Temple Smith. ISBN 9780851171548.
  • Bailey, David J. (2009). The Political Economy of European Social Democracy: A Critical Realist Approach. Routledge. ISBN 9780415604253.
  • Baimbridge, Mark; Mullen, Andrew; Whyman, Philip (2012). The Political Economy of the European Social Model. Routledge. ISBN 9780415476294.
  • Barker, J. Ellis (2019) [1908]. "Chapter V. The Aims and Policy of the Socialists". British Socialism: An Examination of Its Doctrines, Policy, Aims and Practical Proposals. Good Press.
  • Barrientos, Armando; Powell, Martin (2004). "The Route Map of the Third Way". In Hale, Sarah; Leggett, Will; Martell, Luke (eds.). The Third Way and Beyond: Criticisms, Futures and Alternatives. Manchester University Press. pp. 9–26. ISBN 9780719065989.
  • Baum, Bruce (2007). "J. S. Mill and Liberal Socialism". In Urbanati, Nadia; Zachars, Alex (eds.). J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beckett, Francis (2007). Clem Attlee. Politico's.
  • Benn, Tony; Mullin, Chris (1979). Arguments for Socialism. J. Cape.
  • Berberoglu, Berch (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution, and Social Transformation. Springer. ISBN 9783319923543.
  • Berman, Sheri (1998). The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674442610.
  • Berman, Sheri (2006). The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521817998.
  • Bernstein, Eduard (1907) [1899]. Evolutionary Socialism. Translated by Harvey, Edith C. Independent Labour Party.
  • Bevan, Aneurin (1952). In Place of Fear. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Bevan, Aneurin (1961). In Place of Fear (2nd ed.). MacGibbon and Kee.
  • Boggs, Carl; Plotke, David (1980). Politics of Eurocommunism. Black Rose Books. ISBN 9780919618312.
  • Bookchin, Murray (1998). The Third Revolution: Popular Movements in the Revolutionary Era. Vol. 2. London: Cassell. ISBN 9780304335930.
  • Borragan, Nieves Perez-Solorzano; Cini, Michelle, eds. (2013). "Glossary". European Union Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199694754.
  • Bracke, Maud (2013). Which Socialism, Whose Détente?: West European Communism and the Czechoslovak Crisis of 1968. Central European University Press. ISBN 9786155211263.
  • Brandal, Nik; Bratberg, Øivind; Thorsen, Dag Einar (21 February 2013). The Nordic Model of Social Democracy. Springer. ISBN 9781137013279.
  • Braudel, Fernand (1979). The Wheels of Commerce: Civilization and Capitalism 15th–18th Century. Harper & Row.
  • Brockway, Fenner (1980). Britain's First Socialists.
  • Brown, Archie, ed. (2004). The Demise of Marxism-Leninism in Russia. Springer. ISBN 9780333651247.
  • Brown, Susan Love (1997). "The Free Market as Salvation from Government". Meanings of the Market: The Free Market in Western Culture. Berg Publishers.
  • Busky, Donald F. (2000). Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers. ISBN 9780275968861.
  • Cahill, Damien; Cooper, Melinda; Konings, Martijn; Primrose, David, eds. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism. SAGE Publications. ISBN 9781526415974.
  • Calossi, Enrico (2016). Anti-Austerity Left Parties in the European Union. Competition, Coordination, Integration. Pisa: Pisa University Press. ISBN 9788867416653.
  • Cammack, Paul (2004). "Giddens's Way with Words". In Hale, Sarah; Leggett, Will; Martell, Luke (eds.). The Third Way and Beyond: Criticisms, Futures and Alternatives. Manchester University Press. ISBN 97807190-65989.
  • Campbell, John (2009). The Iron Lady: Margaret Thatcher from Grocer's Daughter to Prime Minister. Penguin Books. ISBN 9780099540038.
  • Campbell, Heather M., ed. (2009). "Christian socialism". The Britannica Guide to Political and Social Movements That Changed the Modern World. Rosen Education Service.
  • Carmines, Edward G.; Layman, Geoffrey C. (1997). "Issue Evolution in Postwar American Politics". In Shafer, Byron (ed.). Present Discontents. Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers. ISBN 9781566430500.
  • Carr, E. H. (1985). The Bolshevik Revolution 1917–1923. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 9780393301953.
  • Carson, Kevin (2008). Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective. Charleston, South Carolina: BookSurge.
  • Carson, Kevin (2010). The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto. Charleston, South Carolina: BookSurge.
  • Casier, Marlies; Jongerden, Joost (2010). Nationalisms and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9780203847060.
  • Chamberlain, Greg; Gunson, Phil; Thompson, Andrew, eds. (1989). The Dictionary of Contemporary Politics of South America. Routledge.
  • Chartier, Gary (2009). Economic Justice and Natural Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. (2011). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty (1st ed.). Brooklyn, New York: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia.
  • Clarke, Peter (1981). Liberals and Social Democrats. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521286510.
  • Cockshott, W. Paul; Cottrell, Allin (1993). Towards a New Socialism. Nottingham, England: Spokesman. ISBN 9780851245454.
  • Coker, Jeffrey W. (2002). Confronting American Labor: The New Left Dilemma. University of Missouri Press. ISBN 9780826263575.
  • Cole, Margaret (1961). The Story of Fabian Socialism. Stanford University Press. ISBN 9780804700917.
  • Cole, Mike (2017). "Social Class, Marxism and Socialism". Education, Equality and Human Rights: Issues of Gender, 'Race', Sexuality, Disability and Social Class (4th ed.). Routledge. ISBN 9781351804141.
  • Considère-Charondu, Marie-Claire (2010). "Irish MEPS in an Enlarged Europe". In Gillissen, Christophe (ed.). Ireland: Looking East. Peter Lang. ISBN 9789052016528.
  • Corfe, Robert (2000). Reinventing Democratic Socialism: For People Prosperity. Arena Books. ISBN 9780953846009.
  • Corfe, Robert (2010). The Future of Politics: With the Demise of the Left/Right Confrontational System. Bury St Edmunds, England: Arena Books. ISBN 9781906791469.
  • Crick, Michael (1986) [1984]. The March of Militant. London: Faber & Faber. ISBN 9780571146437.
  • Crosland, Anthony (2006) [1956]. The Future of Socialism. Constable. ISBN 9781845294854.
  • Day, Richard B.; Gaido, Daniel (2011). Discovering Imperialism: Social Democracy to World War I.
  • Dearlove, John; Saunders, Peter (2000). Introduction to British Politics. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 9780745620961.
  • Della Porta, Donatella; Fernández, Joseba; Kouki, Hara; Mosca, Lorenzo (2017). Movement Parties Against Austerity. Polity Press. ISBN 9781509511457.
  • Denitch, Bogdan (1981). Democratic Socialism: The Mass Left in Advanced Industrial Societies. Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc. ISBN 9780865980150.
  • Dimitrakopoulos, Dionyssis G.; Passas, Argyris G. (2011). "The Panhellenic Socialist Movement and European Integration: The Primacy of the Leader". Social Democracy and European Integration. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9780203845349.
  • Dongyoun, Hwang (2016). Anarchism in Korea: Independence, Transnationalism, and the Question of National Development, 1919–1984. SUNY Press. ISBN 9781438461670.
  • Döring, Daniel (2007). Is 'Third Way' Social Democracy Still a Form of Social Democracy?. Norderstedt, Germany: GRIN Publishing. ISBN 9783638868327.
  • Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (1999). Contemporary Political Ideologies (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 9780826451736.
  • Egle, Christoph; Henkes, Christian; Merkel, Wolfgang; Petring, Alexander (2008). Social Democracy in Power: The Capacity to Reform. Routledge Research in Comparative Politics. London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415438209.
  • Ellman, Michael (2007). "The Rise and Fall of Socialist Planning". In Estrin, Saul; Kołodko, Grzegorz W.; Uvalić, Milica (eds.). Transition and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Mario Nuti. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780230546974.
  • Ely, Richard (1883). French and German Socialism in Modern Times. New York: Harper and Brothers. ISBN 9781104069551.
  • Engels, Friedrich; Marx, Karl (1848). The Communist Manifesto.
  • Engels, Friedrich (2004). Collected Works. Vol. 50. New York: International Publishers.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1985). Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691654188. JSTOR j.ctt1m322zp.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1991). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Fédorovski, Vladimir (2007). "Situations VII". Le Fantôme de Staline [The Ghost of Stalin] (in French).
  • Fitzpatrick, Tony (2003). After the New Social Democracy: Social Welfare for the Twenty-First Century. Manchester University Press. ISBN 9780719064777.
  • Fog, Mogens; Kragh, Jens; Larsen, Aksel; Moltke, Kai; Petersen, Gert (1977). Folkesocialisme (in Danish). SP Forl.
  • Foley, Michael (1994). Ideas that Shape Politics. Manchester University Press. ISBN 9780719038259.
  • Franklin, Robert Michael (1990). Liberating Visions: Human Fulfillment and Social Justice in African-American Thought. Fortress Press. ISBN 9780800623920.
  • Freeden, Michael; Sargent, Lyman Tower; Stears, Marc (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199585977.
  • Fryer, Peter (1957). "The Second Soviet Intervention". Hungarian Tragedy. London: D. Dobson. ASIN B0007J7674.
  • Fuchs, Christian (2017). Social Media: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN 9781473987494.
  • Gamble, Peter; Wright, Tony, eds. (1999). The New Social Democracy. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9780631217657.
  • Gaus, Gerald F.; Kukathas, Chandran, eds. (2004). Handbook of Political Theory. SAGE Publications. ISBN 9780761967873.
  • Gay, Peter (1952). The Dilemma of Democratic Socialism: Eduard Bernstein's Challenge to Marx. Columbia University Press.
  • Getzler, Israel (2002) [1982]. Kronstadt 1917–1921: The Fate of a Soviet Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521894425.
  • Gibson, Nigel C., ed. (2011). Living Fanon: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macillan. ISBN 9780230114975.
  • Gillis, William (2011). "The Freed Market". In Chartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. (eds.). Markets Not Capitalism. Brooklyn, New York: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia.
  • Gitlin, Todd (2001). "The Left's Lost Universalism". In Melzer, Arthur M.; Weinberger, Jerry; Zinman, M. Richard (eds.). Politics at the Turn of the Century. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Ghodsee, Kristen (2017). Red Hangover: Legacies of Twentieth-Century Communism. Duke University Press. ISBN 9780822369493.
  • Gilk, Paul (2008). Green Politics Is Eutopian: Essays in Anticipation of the Daughter. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 9781621893936.
  • Godson, Roy; Haseler, Stephen (1978). 'Eurocommunism': Implications for East and West. Springer. ISBN 9781349159345.
  • Goodin, Robert E.; Pettit, Philip; Pogge, Thomas, eds. (1993). A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 9780631179931.
  • Gregory, Paul; Stuart, Robert (2003). Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-First. South-Western College Pub. ISBN 0618261818.
  • Griffiths, Tom G.; Millei, Zsuzsa (2012). Logics of Socialist Education: Engaging with Crisis, Insecurity and Uncertainty. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9789400747289.
  • Grotz, Florian; Hartmann, Christof; Nohlen, Dieter (2001). Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook: Volume I: Middle East, Central Asia, and South Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780191530418.
  • Grotz, Florian; Hartmann, Christof; Nohlen, Dieter (2001). Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook: Volume II: South East Asia, East Asia, and the South Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199249596.
  • Guttridge, Leonard F. (2006). Mutiny: A History of Naval Insurrection. Naval Institute Press. ISBN 9781591143482.
  • Hain, Peter (1995). Ayes to the Left. Lawrence and Wishart. ISBN 9780853158325.
  • Hain, Peter (2015). Back to the Future of Socialism. Policy Press. ISBN 9781447321682.
  • Hall, Duncan (2011). A2 Government and Politics: Ideologies and Ideologies in Action. ISBN 9781447733997.
  • Hamilton, Malcolm (1989). Democratic Socialism in Britain and Sweden. St Martin's Press. ISBN 9781349092345.
  • Harrington, Michael (2011) [1989]. Socialism: Past and Future. New York: Arcade Publishing. ISBN 9781611453355.
  • Harriss, J.; Stokke, Kristian; Tornquist, Olle, eds. (2004). Politicising Democracy: The New Local Politics of Democratisation. Springer. ISBN 9780230502802.
  • Harvey, David (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199283279.
  • Hattersley, Roy (1987). Choose Freedom: The Future of Democratic Socialism. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin. ISBN 9780140104943.
  • Hayek, Friedrich (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Routledge Press. ISBN 0226320618. OCLC 30733740.
  • Healey, Dorothy; Isserman, Maurice (1990). Dorothy Healey Remembers: A Life in the American Communist Party. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-503819-4.
  • Heywood, Andrew (2012). Political Ideologies: An Introduction (5th ed.). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780230367258.
  • Hinchman, Lewis P.; Meyer, Thomas (2007). The Theory of Social Democracy. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. ISBN 9780745641133.
  • Hinnfors, Jonas (2006). Reinterpreting Social Democracy: A History of Stability in the British Labour Party and Swedish Social Democratic Party. Critical Labour Movement Studies. Manchester University Press. ISBN 9780719073625.
  • Honneth, Axel (1995). "The Limits of Liberalism: On the Political-Ethical Discussion Concerning Communitarianism". In Honneth, Axel (ed.). The Fragmented World of the Social. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 079142300X.
  • Horwitz, Morton J. (1994). The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York City, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195092592.
  • Hudis, Peter; Prew, Paul; Rotta, Tomás; Smith, Tony; Vidal, Matt, eds. (2008). "Marx's Concept of Socialism". The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx (PDF). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695545.001.0001. ISBN 9780190695545.
  • Hudson, Kate (2012). The New European Left: A Socialism for the Twenty-First Century?. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780230248762.
  • Humphrys, Elizabeth (2018). How Labour Built Neoliberalism: Australia's Accord, the Labour Movement and the Neoliberal Project. Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 9789004383463.
  • Hunt, E. K. (2002) [1972]. Property and Prophets: The Evolution of Economic Institutions and Ideologies. M. E. Sharpe.
  • Isakhan, Benjamin (2015). Edinburgh Companion to the History of Democracy. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 9781474400145.
  • Isserman, Maurice; Kazin, Michael (2000). America Divided: The Civil War of the 1960s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Isserman, Maurice (2001). The Other American: The Life of Michael Harrington. Public Affairs. ISBN 9781586480363.
  • James, David; Jowitt, Tony; Laybourn, Keith, eds. (1992). "The ILP: A Very Brief History". The Centennial History of the Independent Labour Party. Halifax: Ryburn.
  • Johari, J. C. (1987). Contemporary Political Theory: New Dimensions, Basic Concepts and Major Trends. Sterling Publishers. ISBN 9788120707184.
  • Johnson, Charles W. (2008). "Liberty, Equality, Solidarity: Toward a Dialectical Anarchism". In Long, Roderick T.; Machan, Tibor (eds.). Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country?. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Johnston, Deborah A.; Saad-Filho, Alfredo, eds. (2005). Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader. Pluto Press. ISBN 9780745322995.
  • Juan Jr., E. San (2007). U.S. Imperialism and Revolution in the Philippines. Springer. ISBN 9780230607033.
  • Katseli, Louka T.; Milios, John; Pelagidis, Theodore, eds. (2018). Welfare State and Democracy in Crisis: Reforming the European Model. Routledge. ISBN 9781351788397.
  • Kaufman, Cynthia (2003). Ideas for Action: Relevant Theory for Radical Change. South End Press. ISBN 9780896086937.
  • Kenanoğlu, Mehmet Emin; Sağlam, Halit (2018). 10 Years After the Great Recession: Orthodox versus Heterodox Economics: 9. International Conference on Political Economy. Ijopec Publication. ISBN 9781912503476.
  • Kendall, Diana (2011). Sociology in Our Time: The Essentials. Cengage Learning. ISBN 9781111305505.
  • Kindersley, Richard, ed. (1981). In Search of Eurocommunism. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780312411145.
  • Kindersley, Richard, ed. (2016). In Search of Eurocommunism. Springer. ISBN 9781349165810.
  • Klein, Naomi (2008). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Picador. ISBN 9780312427993.
  • Kloppenberg, James T. (1986). Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195053043.
  • Kowalski, Werner (1985). Geschichte der Sozialistischen Arbeiter-Internationale, (1923–1940) (in German). Berlin: Dt. Verl. d. Wissenschaften.
  • Kwok, Pui-lan; Rieger, Joerg (2013). Occupy Religion: Theology of the Multitude. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781442217928.
  • Laclau, Ernesto; Mouffe, Chantal (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Verso. ISBN 0860910679. OCLC 67440480.
  • Lafontaine, Oskar (2009). Left Parties Everywhere?. Socialist Renewal. Nottingham, England: Spokesman Books. ISBN 9780851247649.
  • LeBlanc, Paul (2014). Marx, Lenin, and the Revolutionary Experience: Studies of Communism and Radicalism in an Age of Globalization. Routledge. ISBN 9781317793526.
  • Lenin, Vladimir (1964). Lenin Collected Works. Vol. 26. Lawrence and Wishart.
  • Leventhal, F. M., ed. (2002). Twentieth-century Britain: An Encyclopedia. Peter Lang. ISBN 9780820451084.
  • Lewis, Jane; Surender, Rebecca, eds. (2004). Welfare State Change: Towards a Third Way?. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199266722.
  • Li, He (2015). Political Thought and China's Transformation: Ideas Shaping Reform in Post-Mao China. Springer. ISBN 9781137427816.
  • Lih, Lars T. (2005). Lenin Rediscovered: What Is to Be Done? in Context. Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 9789004131200.
  • Link, Arthur S., ed. (1968). The Papers of Woodrow Wilson. Vol. 5 (1st ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691045870.
  • Lipow, Arthur (1991). Authoritarian Socialism in America: Edward Bellamy and the Nationalist Movement. University of California Press. ISBN 9780520075436.
  • Long, Roderick T. (2000). Reason and Value: Aristotle versus Rand. Washington, D.C.: Objectivist Center.
  • Long, Roderick T. (2012). "Anarchism". In D'Agostino, Fred; Gaus, Gerald F. (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy.
  • Lowe, Rodney (2004) [1993]. The Welfare State in Britain Since 1945 (3rd, illustrated ed.). Macmillan Education UK. ISBN 9781403911933.
  • Ludlam, Steve; Smith, Martin J., eds. (7 October 2017). Governing as New Labour: Policy and Politics Under Blair. Macmillan International Higher Education. ISBN 9781403906786.
  • Luxemburg, Rosa (1900). "Part Two". Reform or Revolution.
  • Magstadt, Thomas M. (2016). Understanding Politics: Ideas, Institutions, and Issues (12th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN 9781305629905.
  • March, Luke (2008). Contemporary Far Left Parties in Europe: From Marxism to the Mainstream? (PDF). Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. ISBN 9783868720006. Retrieved 9 November 2021.
  • March, Luke (2016). Europe's Radical Left: From Marginality to the Mainstream?. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781783485376.
  • Marshall, Peter (2010). Demanding the Impossible. PM Press.
  • Marx, Karl (1875). "Part I". Critique of the Gotha Program.
  • McBrien, Richard P. (1994). "IV". Catholicism. Harper Collins.
  • McNally, David (1993). Against the Market: Political Economy, Market Socialism and the Marxist Critique. Verso. ISBN 9780860916062.
  • Medina, Eden (2014). Cybernetic Revolutionaries: Technology and Politics in Allende's Chile. MIT Press. ISBN 9780262525961.
  • Megill, Kenneth A. (1970). The New Democratic Theory. New York: Free Press. ISBN 9780029207901.
  • Miller, David (1990). Market, State, and Community: Theoretical Foundations of Market Socialism. Oxford University Press.
  • Mises, Ludwig (1936) [1922]. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. London: Jonathan Cape. OCLC 72357479.
  • Mises, Ludwig (1962) [1927]. Goddard, Arthur (ed.). The Free and Prosperous Commonwealth: An Exposition of the Ideas of Classical Liberalism. Translated by Raico, Ralph. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand. ISBN 9780442090579.
  • Moschonas, Gerassimos (2002). In the Name of Social Democracy: The Great Transformation, 1945 to the Present. Translated by Elliott, Gregory. London: Verso Books. ISBN 9781859846391.
  • Munck, Ronaldo (2012). Contemporary Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Napier, Diane Brook (2010). "African Socialism, Post-Colonial Development, and Education: Change and Continuity in the Post-Socialist Era". Post-socialism Is Not Dead: Rereading the Global in Comparative Education. International Perspectives on Education and Society. Vol. 14. Emerald Group Pub Ltd. ISBN 9780857244178.
  • Napolitano, Giorgio (2005). Dal Pci al socialismo europeo. Un'autobiografia politica [From the Communist Party to European Socialism. A Political Autobiography] (in Italian). Laterza. ISBN 9788842077152.
  • Newman, Michael (2005). Socialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780192804310.
  • Nuttall, Jeremy (2006). Psychological Socialism: The Labour Party and Qualities of Mind and Character, 1931 to the Present. Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 9781847792273.
  • O'Reilly, David (2007). The New Progressive Dilemma: Australia and Tony Blair's Legacy. Springer. ISBN 9780230625471.
  • O'Rourke, William (1993). "L: Michael Harrington". Signs of the Literary Times: Essays, Reviews, Profiles, 1970–1992. The Margins of Literature. SUNY Series. ISBN 079141681X. 9780791416815.
  • Orwell, George (1980) [1938]. "1". Homage to Catalonia. San Diego: Harcourt Brace & Co. ISBN 0156421178.
  • Palley, Thomas I. (2005). From Keynesianism to Neoliberalism: Shifting Paradigms in Economics. Pluto Press.
  • Palley, Thomas I. (2013). From Financial Crisis to Stagnation: The Destruction of Shared Prosperity and the Role of Economics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107612464.
  • Pani, Mica; Panic, M. (2011). "Neoliberalism versus Social Democracy: Empirical Evidence". Globalization: A Threat to International Cooperation and Peace?. Sprnger. ISBN 9780230307018.
  • Patsouras, Louis (2005). Marx in Context.
  • Payne, Robert (1964). The Life and Death of Lenin. Grafton.
  • Pestritto, Ronald J., ed. (2005). Woodrow Wilson: The Essential Political Writing. Lexington Books. ISBN 9780691045870.
  • Pierson, Cristopher (1995). Socialism After Communism: The New Market Socialism. Penn State Press. ISBN 9780271014791.
  • Pearson, Hugh (1994). The Shadow of the Panther: Huey Newton and the Price of Black Power in America. Perseus Books. ISBN 9780201483413.
  • Peterson, D. J. (1993). Troubled Lands: The Legacy of Soviet Environmental Destruction (A Rand Research Study). Westview Press. ISBN 9780813316741.
  • Picard, Robert (1985). The Press and the Decline of Democracy: Democratic Socialist Response in Public Policy. Praeger. ISBN 9780865980150.
  • Polasky, Janet (1995). The Democratic Socialism of Emile Vandervelde: Between Reform and Revolution. Oxford.
  • Premadas, Ralph R. (1986). Melanesian Socialism: Vanuatu's Quest for Self-definition (Discussion Paper Series/Centre for Developing-Area Studies). McGill University.
  • Popper, Karl (1994). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Routledge Classics. ISBN 9780415610216.
  • Prychitko, David L. (2002). Markets, Planning, and Democracy: Essays After the Collapse of Communism. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 9781840645194.
  • Quadir, Fahim (2004). Lele, J. (ed.). Democracy and Civil Society in Asia: Volume 2: Democratic Transitions and Social Movements in Asia. Springer. ISBN 9780230285910.
  • Ramnath, Maia (2019). "Non-Western Anarchisms and Postcolonialism". In Levy, Carl; Adams, Matthew S. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Springer. ISBN 9783319756202.
  • Ratner, Carl (2019). "The Neolberal Political Economy". Neoliberal Psychology. Springer. ISBN 9783030029821.
  • Raza, Syed Ali (2012). Social Democratic System. Global Peace Trust. ISBN 9789699757006.
  • Reisman, David, ed. (1996). Democratic Socialism in Britain: Classic Texts in Economic and Political Thought, 1825–1952. Vol. 3.
  • Reisman, David, ed. (1996). Democratic Socialism in Britain: Classic Texts in Economic and Political Thought, 1825–1952. Vol. 7.
  • Roemer, John E. (1994). "The long term and the short term". A Future for Socialism. Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674339460.
  • Romano, Flavio (2006). Clinton and Blair: The Political Economy of the Third Way. Routledge Frontiers of Political Economy. Vol. 75. London: Routledge. ISBN 9780415378581.
  • Romano, Flavio (7 May 2007). Clinton and Blair: The Political Economy of the Third Way. Routledge Frontiers of Political Economy. Vol. 75. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781134182527.
  • Rosser Jr., J. Barkley; Rosser, Marina V. (2003). Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262182348.
  • Rubio, José Luis (1917). Las internacionales obreras en América (in Spanish). Madrid.
  • Meyer, Henning; Rutherford, Jonathan, eds. (2011). The Future of European Social Democracy: Building the Good Society. Springer. ISBN 9780230355040.
  • Salvadori, Massimo (1968). Modern Socialism. Palgrave Macmillan UK. ISBN 9781349002047.
  • Sanders, Bernie (2016). Our Revolution. Thomas Dunne Books. ISBN 9781250132925.
  • Sargent, Lyman Tower (2008). Contemporary Political Ideologies: A Comparative Analysis (14th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN 9780495569398.
  • Scheidel, Walter (2017). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691165028.
  • Schlesinger Jr., Arthur M. (1962). "Liberalism in America: A Note for Europeans". The Politics of Hope and The Bitter Heritage. Boston: Riverside Press.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers. ISBN 9780061330087. OCLC 22556726.
  • Sciabarra, Chris Matthew (2000). Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Sears, Kathleen (2019). Socialism 101: From the Bolsheviks and Karl Marx to Universal Healthcare and the Democratic Socialists, Everything You Need to Know about Socialism. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 9781507211366.
  • Serge, Victor (1937). From Lenin to Stalin (PDF). New York: Pioneer Publishers.
  • Seyd, Patrick (1987). The Rise and Fall of the Labour Left. London: Macmillan Education. ISBN 9780333447482.
  • Shaw, Eric (1988). Discipline and Discord in the Labour Party: The Politics of Managerial Control in the Labour Party, 1951–1987. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 218–290. ISBN 9780719024832.
  • Sinclair, Upton (1918). Upton Sinclair's: A Monthly Magazine: for Social Justice, by Peaceful Means If Possible.
  • Skirda, Alexandre (2004). Nestor Makhno: Anarchy's Cossack. AK Press.
  • Sloan, Pat (1937). Soviet Democracy. London: Left Book Club.
  • Smele, Jonathan (2006). The Russian Revolution and Civil War 1917–1921: An Annotated Bibliography. Continuum. ISBN 9781591143482.
  • Staab, Andreas (2011). The European Union Explained: Institutions, Actors, Global Impact (2nd ed.). Indiana University Press. ISBN 9780253001641.
  • Stalin, Joseph (1976) [1924]. "The October Revolution and the Tactists of the Russian Communists". Problems of Leninism. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.
  • Steele, David Ramsay (1992). From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation. Open Court Publishing Company. ISBN 9780875484495.
  • Steger, Manfred B. (1997). The Quest for Evolutionary Socialism: Eduard Bernstein and Social Democracy. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York City, United States; Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521582001.
  • Steger, Manfred B. (1999). "Friedrich Engels and the Origins of German Revisionism: Another Look". In Steger, Manfred B.; Carver, Terrell (eds.). Engels After Marx. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University. pp. 181–196. ISBN 9780271018911.
  • Steinmo, Sven (2002). Globalization and Taxation: Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State.
  • Tangian, Andranik (2013). Mathematical Theory of Democracy. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9783642387241.
  • Taylor, Andrew J. (2013). "Trade Unions and the Politics of Social Democratic Renewal". In Gillespie, Richard; Paterson, William E. (eds.). Rethinking Social Democracy in Western Europe. Routledge. ISBN 9781135236182.
  • Teeple, Gary (2000). Globalization and the Decline of Social Reform: Into the Twenty-First Century. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 9781551930268.
  • Thomas, Norman (1953). Democratic Socialism: A New Appraisal. New York: League for Industrial Democracy. ISBN 9780598691606.
  • Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. Victor Gollancz.
  • Thompson, E. P. (1977). William Morris: Romantic to Revolutionary. London: Merlin.
  • Thompson, Noel W. (2006). Political Economy and the Labour Party: The Economics of Democratic Socialism, 1884–2005 (PDF) (2nd ed.). Abingdon, England: Routledge. ISBN 9780415328807.
  • Thrale, M., ed. (1983). Selections from the Papers of the London Corresponding Society 1792–1799. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ticktin, Hillel (1998). "The Problem is Market Socialism". In Ollman, Bertell (ed.). Market Socialism: The Debate Among Socialists. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780415919661.
  • Tomlinson, Jim (1997). Democratic Socialism and Economic Policy: The Attlee Years, 1945–1951. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521550956.
  • Trechsel, Alexander H. (2013). Towards a Federal Europe. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781317998181.
  • Tucker, Benjamin (1972). State Socialism and Anarchism and Other Essays: Including the Attitude of Anarchism Toward Industrial Combinations and Why I Am an Anarchist (1st ed.). Ralph Myles Pub. ISBN 9780879260156.
  • Vincent, Andrew (2010). Modern Political Ideologies. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
  • Wagner, F. Peter (1996). Rudolf Hilferding: Theory and Politics of Democratic Socialism. Atlantic Highlands.
  • Wainwright, Hilary (1987). Labour: A Tale of Two Parties. Hogarth Press. ISBN 9780701207786.
  • Walters, William (2001). "Governing Unemployment: Transforming "the Social"?". In Pavlich, George; Wickham, Gary (eds.). Rethinking Law, Society and Governance: Foucault's Bequest. Hart Publishing. ISBN 9781841132938.
  • Webb, Beatrice; Webb, Sidney (1935). Soviet Communism: A New Civilisation?. London: Longmans.
  • Weinstein, James (1969). The Decline of Socialism in America, 1912–1925. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Weisskopf, Thomas E. (1994). "Challenges to Market Socialism: A Response to Critics". In Roosevelt, Frank; Belkin, David (eds.). Why Market Socialism? Voices from Dissent. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe. pp. 297–318. ISBN 9781563244650.
  • Whyman, Philip (2005). "Socialism". Third Way Economics: Theory and Evaluation. Springer. ISBN 9780230514652.
  • Williams, Raymond (1985) [1976]. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (revised ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195204698. OCLC 1035920683.
  • Winn, Peter (2004). Victims of the Chilean Miracle: Workers and Neoliberalism in the Pinochet Era, 1973–2002. Duke University Press. ISBN 9780822333098.
  • Woodcock, George (1962). Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements.
  • Wright, Anthony (1999). "Social Democracy and Democratic Socialism". In Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (eds.). Contemporary Political Ideologies (2nd ed.). London: Continuum. pp. 80–103. ISBN 9781855676053.

Encyclopedias[edit]

  • Alt, James E.; Chambers, Simone; Garrett, Geoffrey; Kurian, George Thomas; Levi, Margaret; McClain, Paula D. (2010). The Encyclopedia of Political Science Set. CQ Press. ISBN 9781933116440.
  • Docherty, James C.; Lamb, Peter, eds. (2006). "Social democracy". Historical Dictionary of Socialism. Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements. Vol. 73 (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 9780810855601.
  • Lamb, Peter (2015). "Social democracy". Historical Dictionary of Socialism. Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781442258266.
  • Miller, David (1998). "Social Democracy". In Craig, Edward (ed.). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 8. Routledge. p. 827. ISBN 9780415187138.
  • Panfilov, E. G. (1979). "Democratic Socialism". The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (3rd ed.).
  • Safra, Jacob E. (1998). "Social democracy". The New Encyclopaedia Britannica. Vol. 10 (15th ed.). Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. p. 920.
  • Schweickart, David (2007). "Democratic Socialism". In Anderson, Gary L.; Herr, Kathryn G. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. ISBN 9781412918121.
  • Stevens, Mark A. (2000). "Social democracy". Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Encyclopedia. Merriam-Webster. p. 1504. ISBN 9780877790174. Political ideology that advocates a peaceful, evolutionary transition of society from -capitalism to -socialism, using established political processes.
  • Wilson, Fred (10 July 2007). "John Stuart Mill". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 17 March 2008.

Journals[edit]

News[edit]

Speeches[edit]

  • Chartier, Gary (13 April 2010). Free-Market Anti-Capitalism? (Speech). Cæsar's Palace, Las Vegas: Association of Private Enterprise Education.
  • Esteva, Gustavo (October 2013). Liberty According to the Zapatistas (Speech). Lecture at the Bridgeport Free Skool. Bridgeport, Connecticut.
  • Palme, Olof (1982). Därför är jag demokratisk socialist [Why I am a Democratic Socialist] (Speech) (in Swedish). 1982 congress of the Swedish Social Democratic Party.{{cite speech}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  • Sanders, Bernie (19 November 2015). Democratic Socialism in the United States (Speech). Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on 20 July 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2020.
  • Sanders, Bernie (12 June 2019). My Vision for Democratic Socialism in America (Speech). George Washington University, Washington D.C. Retrieved 1 March 2020.
  • Thomas, Norman (2 February 1936). Is the New Deal Socialism? (Speech). Chicago Democratic Socialists of America. Archived from the original on 12 July 2010. Retrieved 28 January 2016.

Web[edit]